Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return bpf_conformance_test_cpu_version_t::unknown for unrecognized opcode sequence #191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

Alan-Jowett
Copy link
Owner

Resolves: #190

Return bpf_conformance_test_cpu_version_t::unknown for unrecognized opcode sequence

…pcode sequence

Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <alan.jowett@microsoft.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 95.806% (-0.2%) from 95.978%
when pulling d6e78ce on unsupported_instruction
into ab0a649 on main.

@Alan-Jowett Alan-Jowett merged commit 45e7c9b into main Jan 22, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@Alan-Jowett Alan-Jowett deleted the unsupported_instruction branch January 22, 2024 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The function get_instruction_cpu_version asserts on unknown opcode
2 participants