-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ACS-6653 Bump Tika, POI, bouncycastle, commons-compress, xmlbeans #2422
Conversation
</dependency> | ||
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>org.bouncycastle</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>bcmail-jdk15to18</artifactId> | ||
</dependency> | ||
<dependency> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed because we don't exclude bcmail
from tika-parsers-standard-package
anymore so we don't need to re-declare this anymore IMO.
<dependency.truezip.version>7.7.10</dependency.truezip.version> | ||
<dependency.poi.version>5.2.2</dependency.poi.version> | ||
<dependency.poi-ooxml-lite.version>5.2.3</dependency.poi-ooxml-lite.version> | ||
<dependency.poi.version>5.2.5</dependency.poi.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed poi-ooxml-lite.version
property as it should always match the poi
version anyways.
</dependency> | ||
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>org.apache.poi</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>poi-ooxml-lite</artifactId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
poi-ooxml-lite
is already a transitive dependency of poi-ooxml
, no need to redeclare it.
<exclusions> | ||
<exclusion> | ||
<groupId>org.apache.poi</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>poi-ooxml-schemas</artifactId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This transitive dependency is not even really there so I'm not sure why the exclude was here, probably by mistake.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the detailed explanation @dsibilio !
Bumping a bunch of intertwined/related dependencies together to make sure everything works as intended.
Propagation tests:
Related PRs:
maven-enforcer-plugin
requirements)