feature: compatible with both k8s and cri-o annotations

[zhuangqh]

Signed-off-by: zhuangqh zhuangqhc@gmail.com

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

write both of these two annotations

1. compatible with old container
2. enable runtime recognize the container type using popular annotation
3. these two annotation is only read by runtime, not used by pouch

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)? (你真的觉得不需要加测试吗？)

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2803 into master will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2803      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    69.4%   69.46%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         278      278              
  Lines       17373    17379       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        12058    12072      +14     
+ Misses       3971     3966       -5     
+ Partials     1344     1341       -3

Flag	Coverage Δ
#criv1alpha2_test	39.33% <100%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
#integration_test_0	36.57% <0%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
#integration_test_1	35.25% <0%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
#integration_test_2	36.44% <0%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
#integration_test_3	35.27% <0%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
#node_e2e_test	35.09% <100%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
#unittest	28.71% <0%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cri/v1alpha2/cri.go	71.3% <100%> (+0.32%)	⬆️
cri/v1alpha2/cri_utils.go	88.7% <100%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
ctrd/watch.go	71.83% <0%> (-5.64%)	⬇️
pkg/streams/utils.go	89.28% <0%> (-2.39%)	⬇️
daemon/mgr/container.go	60.89% <0%> (+0.42%)	⬆️
daemon/mgr/container_utils.go	82.38% <0%> (+0.56%)	⬆️
ctrd/container.go	55.64% <0%> (+1.33%)	⬆️

[allencloud]

I think CRI-O is the CRI implementation as a bridge of kubelet and runc? Am I right?
If that, what is the logic to add cri-o annotation support in PouchContainer? @zhuangqh

[zhuangqh]

I think CRI-O is the CRI implementation as a bridge of kubelet and runc? Am I right?
If that, what is the logic to add cri-o annotation support in PouchContainer? @zhuangqh

@allencloud actually I don't know either. When I first saw the PouchContainer's code, it was that.
However, there are many containers running online depend on this annotation now, we have no choice but still keep this annotation support now.

[fuweid]

LGTM