Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vco eye tracking #2639

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 3, 2023
Merged

Vco eye tracking #2639

merged 10 commits into from
Jan 3, 2023

Conversation

aamster
Copy link
Contributor

@aamster aamster commented Dec 22, 2022

#2608

Tested manually that it works as expected

@aamster aamster marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2022 21:12
Copy link
Contributor

@morriscb morriscb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, a few questions to address and I think a clean up of a doc or two.


Parameters
----------
ophys_experiment_id
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume you confirmed that the ids on the files are experiment_ids and not session_ids as we previously thought?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@aamster aamster Dec 23, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are experiment ids. One issue is that there are ~800 eye tracking files, but 2800 ophys experiments in the VCO release, so about 2000 experiments without eye tracking. I don't know if this was intentional. I will ask.

allensdk/api/queries/brain_observatory_api.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Parameters
----------
ophys_experiment_id
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Types?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@aamster aamster Dec 23, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Surrounding code did not use types, so I didn't either. My argument is that it makes it easier to read if adjacent code is stylistically similar. I guess the counterargument would be that 2 wrongs don't make a right.

@aamster aamster merged commit 32177a2 into rc/2.14.1 Jan 3, 2023
@aamster aamster deleted the vco_eye_tracking branch January 3, 2023 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants