Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add isModelDoc Attribute for AI learning #1497

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

saravmajestic
Copy link
Collaborator

@saravmajestic saravmajestic commented Nov 6, 2024

Overview

Problem

AI agent could not differentiate model and column instruction

Solution

Add isModelDoc attribute while training AI agent

Screenshot/Demo

A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.

How to test

  • Steps to be followed to verify the solution or code changes
  • Mention if there is any settings configuration added/changed/deleted

Checklist

  • I have run this code and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • README.md updated and added information about my change

Important

Add isModelDoc flag via extra attribute to differentiate model documentation in AI components.

  • Behavior:
    • Add extra attribute to CoachForm in altimate-components.d.ts to include isModelDoc flag.
    • Update CoachAi and CoachAiIfModified components to accept extra attribute.
    • Modify DocumentationEditor to pass extra with isModelDoc: true to CoachAiIfModified.
  • Components:
    • CoachForm now accepts extra attribute for additional context.
    • CoachAi and CoachAiIfModified updated to handle extra attribute.
  • Misc:
    • Ensure isModelDoc flag is used to differentiate model documentation from column instructions.

This description was created by Ellipsis for a9c73b6. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced CoachForm and related components to accept an additional extra property, allowing for more flexible data handling.
    • DocumentationEditor updated to provide contextual information through the extra prop in the CoachAiIfModified component.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved state management and error handling in the rA function for better performance and reliability.
  • Refactor

    • Updated component signatures across several files to incorporate the new extra prop, enhancing the overall functionality without altering existing logic.

@saravmajestic saravmajestic self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications to several components, primarily enhancing the CoachForm and related components by adding an optional extra prop. This prop allows these components to accept additional contextual data, improving their flexibility. Changes include updates to the function signatures of CoachForm, rA, CoachAi, and CoachAiIfModified, ensuring that the new prop is consistently integrated throughout the components. The overall logic of the components remains largely unchanged, with no significant alterations to error handling or control flow.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts Updated CoachForm to include an optional extra prop of type Record<string, unknown>.
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/main.js Modified rA function to include an optional extra parameter. Renamed internal state variables and adjusted logic accordingly.
webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/DocumentationEditor.tsx Updated CoachAiIfModified component to accept an extra prop with isModelDoc set to true.
webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAi.tsx Added optional extra prop to CoachAi, which is passed to CoachForm.
webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAiIfModified.tsx Updated CoachAiIfModified to include an optional extra prop of type Record<string, unknown>.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mdesmet
  • AdiGajbhiye

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Hey @saravmajestic, here is an example of how you can ask me to improve this pull request:

@Sweep Add unit tests for the `CoachForm` component to verify that the new `extra` prop is correctly passed and handled. Test scenarios should include:
- Passing an empty `extra` prop
- Passing an `extra` prop with `isModelDoc: true`
- Verifying that the `extra` prop is included in the API request payload

📖 For more information on how to use Sweep, please read our documentation.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to a9c73b6 in 38 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 214 lines of code in 5 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 6 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts:69
  • Draft comment:
    The extra prop is added to CoachForm, but its purpose is unclear. Ensure its usage is documented or handled appropriately.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The extra prop is added to the CoachForm component, but its usage is not clear from the provided code. It seems to be passed down without any specific handling or documentation on its purpose. This could lead to confusion or misuse in the future.
2. webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAi.tsx:8
  • Draft comment:
    The extra prop is added but its purpose is unclear. Ensure its usage is documented or handled appropriately.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The extra prop is added to the CoachAi component, but its usage is not clear from the provided code. It seems to be passed down without any specific handling or documentation on its purpose. This could lead to confusion or misuse in the future.
3. webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAiIfModified.tsx:6
  • Draft comment:
    The extra prop is added but its purpose is unclear. Ensure its usage is documented or handled appropriately.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The extra prop is added to the CoachAiIfModified component, but its usage is not clear from the provided code. It seems to be passed down without any specific handling or documentation on its purpose. This could lead to confusion or misuse in the future.
4. webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts:69
  • Draft comment:
    Please specify a return type for the CoachForm function to ensure easier refactoring and understanding of the code.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.
5. webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts:71
  • Draft comment:
    Please specify a return type for the CoachFormButton function to ensure easier refactoring and understanding of the code.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.
6. webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/main.js:24710
  • Draft comment:
    Consider using early returns in the function to improve readability and reduce nesting.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.

Workflow ID: wflow_931kLhdgQ6kTeaSS


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/main.js (2)

24713-24720: Consider using more descriptive variable names.

The state variables and updater functions (r, a, i, l) are not descriptive. Consider using more meaningful names to improve code readability.

-  const [r, a] = ue(), [i, l] = ue(!1)
+  const [aiResponse, setAiResponse] = ue(), [isEditing, setIsEditing] = ue(!1)

24776-24793: Consider adding visual feedback for validation limits.

The textarea has character limits (10-500), but there's no visual indicator for users. Consider adding a character counter or validation feedback.

          <Ln,
          {
            type: "textarea",
            value: r.ai_response,
            onChange: (y) => {
              a({
                ...r,
                ai_response: y.target.value
              });
            },
-           style: { fieldSizing: "content" }
+           style: { fieldSizing: "content" },
+           maxLength: 500,
+           placeholder: "Enter at least 10 characters"
          }
webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAiIfModified.tsx (1)

44-44: Consider adding type safety for the isModelDoc property

While the Record<string, unknown> type is flexible, consider creating a specific type interface for the extra prop to ensure type safety for the expected isModelDoc property.

+interface ExtraProps {
+  isModelDoc?: boolean;
+  [key: string]: unknown;
+}

 const CoachAiIfModified = ({
   column,
   model,
-  extra,
+  extra
 }: {
   column?: string;
   model?: string;
-  extra?: Record<string, unknown>;
+  extra?: ExtraProps;
 }): JSX.Element | null => {
webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAi.tsx (1)

10-10: Consider documenting the purpose of the extra prop.

Since this prop is specifically added to support the isModelDoc attribute for AI learning (as per PR objective), it would be helpful to add JSDoc comments explaining its purpose and expected contents.

 const CoachAi = ({
   context,
   extra,
 }: {
+  /** Additional context passed to the underlying CoachForm component */
   context?: Record<string, unknown>;
+  /** Extra metadata for AI learning (e.g., isModelDoc flag) */
   extra?: Record<string, unknown>;
 }): JSX.Element | null => {

Also applies to: 13-13, 46-46

webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (1)

289-289: Consider documenting the expected properties in extra.

While the Record<string, unknown> type is flexible, it would be helpful to document the expected properties (like isModelDoc) using JSDoc comments or by creating a more specific type interface. This would improve type safety and developer experience.

Example documentation:

/**
 * Additional contextual data for the form
 * @property {boolean} isModelDoc - Indicates if the documentation is for a model
 */
extra?: Record<string, unknown>;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between abab66a and a9c73b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (2 hunks)
  • webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/main.js (2 hunks)
  • webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/DocumentationEditor.tsx (1 hunks)
  • webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAi.tsx (2 hunks)
  • webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAiIfModified.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/main.js (2)

24796-24797: LGTM: Edit/Save toggle functionality.

The implementation of edit mode toggle and save functionality is clean and provides good user experience.


24721-24742: Verify API endpoint compatibility with extra parameters.

The coach/training/confirm endpoint now receives additional metadata through the extra parameter. Please ensure the backend API is updated to handle these new fields, particularly isModelDoc.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the API endpoint implementation and its parameter handling.


Let me try one more search with a different approach to find the API usage and parameter handling.


Let me search for more specific API endpoint implementation details.


Let me try one more search focusing on the API request handling and spread operator usage.


Based on the code context found earlier, I can now provide a conclusion about the API endpoint compatibility:

The endpoint already supports additional metadata through spread operator

The implementation shows the endpoint accepts additional parameters through the spread operator:

"coach/training/confirm", {
  content: r.ai_response,
  category: r.category,
  taskLabel: e,
  personalizationScope: r.personalizationScope,
  metadata: t,
  ...o
}

This means the endpoint is designed to handle arbitrary extra parameters, including isModelDoc, making it compatible with the changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the API endpoint definition to verify parameter handling
rg -A 10 "coach/training/confirm" --type ts --type js

Length of output: 1766


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for API endpoint implementation details
ast-grep --pattern 'coach/training/confirm' --lang javascript

# Look for any type definitions or interfaces related to the endpoint
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.d.ts' -A 5 'coach/training/confirm'

# Search for test files that might contain endpoint usage examples
rg -g '*test*' -g '*spec*' 'coach/training/confirm'

Length of output: 168


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the spread operator usage with the endpoint to understand parameter handling
rg -B 5 -A 5 '\.\.\.' webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/main.js

# Look for any API-related configuration or types
fd -e ts -e js -e json --full-path . -x rg -l 'api.*config|endpoints|routes'

Length of output: 251629


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for API endpoint implementation and request handling
rg -A 10 "coach/training/confirm" ./src/altimate.ts

# Look for any API request handling in DbtDocsRenderer
rg -A 10 "coach/training/confirm" ./webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/DbtDocsRenderer.js

Length of output: 138


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for API request handling with spread operator
rg -B 5 -A 5 'coach/training/confirm.*\{.*\.\.\..*\}' 

# Look for any API endpoint type definitions
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.d.ts' -A 5 'coach/training/confirm'

Length of output: 110

webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAiIfModified.tsx (1)

9-9: LGTM: Props interface modification is well-typed

The addition of the optional extra prop with type Record<string, unknown> is appropriate for passing flexible contextual data like isModelDoc.

Also applies to: 13-13

webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAi.tsx (1)

10-10: LGTM! Clean prop interface extension.

The addition of the optional extra prop with type Record<string, unknown> is well-implemented and maintains type safety.

Also applies to: 13-13

webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/DocumentationEditor.tsx (1)

198-201: LGTM! The change aligns with the PR objective.

The addition of isModelDoc flag will help the AI differentiate between model and column instructions during the documentation process.

Let's verify the prop type definition exists:

✅ Verification successful

Props type definition is correctly implemented

The extra prop is properly typed as an optional Record<string, unknown> in the CoachAiIfModified component's props interface, and it's correctly passed down to the CoachAi component. The implementation aligns with the PR objectives and is type-safe.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the CoachAiIfModified component's props include the 'extra' property
# Expected: Should find type definition including 'extra?: Record<string, unknown>' or similar

# Search for CoachAiIfModified component/interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $name {
  $$$
  extra?: $type
  $$$
}'

# Alternatively, look for the component definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const CoachAiIfModified = ($props: { $$$, extra?: $type, $$$ })'

Length of output: 157


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find the CoachAiIfModified component definition
# First, find the file containing CoachAiIfModified
fd "CoachAiIfModified" --type f

# Then search for its implementation and type definitions
rg "CoachAiIfModified" -A 5 --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 201


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the CoachAiIfModified component file directly
cat "webview_panels/src/modules/documentationEditor/components/docGenerator/CoachAiIfModified.tsx"

Length of output: 1249

webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (1)

69-69: LGTM! Component signature updated to support model/column differentiation.

The CoachForm component signature has been appropriately updated to include the extra parameter, allowing it to handle additional contextual data like isModelDoc.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AdiGajbhiye AdiGajbhiye left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@anandgupta42 anandgupta42 merged commit f5035b5 into master Nov 7, 2024
10 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants