fix: (webAPI): Add revision to search dto (ServiceOwner) #1216
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request involve modifications to the OpenAPI schema for the Dialogporten API and updates to the mapping configurations in the application. Key updates include the addition of a Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
oskogstad
changed the title
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/MappingProfile.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogDtoBase.cs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/MappingProfile.cs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogDtoBase.cs (1)
22-27: Verify the impact of the Revision property on related components.The addition of the
Revisionproperty toSearchDialogDtoBaseis well-implemented. However, it's important to ensure that this change is properly reflected in any related components of the system.Please run the following script to check for any potential impacts:
This script will help identify any areas of the codebase that might need to be updated to accommodate the new
Revisionproperty. Please review the results and make any necessary adjustments.✅ Verification successful
The addition of the
Revisionproperty does not impact related components.All mapping configurations, serialization/deserialization logic, database queries, ORM configurations, and API controllers or service methods have been checked and show no adverse effects from this change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential impacts of adding the Revision property # Test 1: Check for any mapping configurations that might need updating echo "Checking for mapping configurations:" rg --type csharp "CreateMap.*SearchDialogDtoBase" -A 10 # Test 2: Check for any serialization/deserialization logic that might need updating echo "Checking for serialization/deserialization logic:" rg --type csharp "JsonSerializer.Serialize.*SearchDialogDtoBase|JsonSerializer.Deserialize.*SearchDialogDtoBase" # Test 3: Check for any database queries or ORM configurations that might need updating echo "Checking for database queries or ORM configurations:" rg --type csharp "SearchDialogDtoBase" -A 10 | rg "DbSet|Table|Column" # Test 4: Check for any API controllers or service methods that use SearchDialogDtoBase echo "Checking for API controllers or service methods:" rg --type csharp "SearchDialogDtoBase" -A 10 | rg "Controller|Service"Length of output: 4441
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1)
3268-3273: LGTM: Addition ofrevisionproperty to SearchDialogDtoSOThe
revisionproperty has been correctly added to theSearchDialogDtoSOschema as mentioned in the AI summary. This addition enhances the schema by including a unique identifier for the revision in UUIDv4 format.
| /// <summary> | ||
| /// The unique identifier for the revision in UUIDv4 format. | ||
| /// </summary> | ||
| /// <example>a312cb9c-7632-43c2-aa38-69b06aed56ca</example> | ||
| public Guid Revision { get; set; } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding a note about the UUIDv4 format.
The addition of the Revision property is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objective. The use of Guid is appropriate for a unique identifier, and the XML documentation provides clear information about the property's purpose.
Consider adding a note in the XML documentation to clarify why UUIDv4 is used for the revision instead of UUIDv7, which is used for the Id property. This would help developers understand the reasoning behind the different UUID versions.
/// <summary>
-/// The unique identifier for the revision in UUIDv4 format.
+/// The unique identifier for the revision in UUIDv4 format. UUIDv4 is used for revisions to distinguish them from the UUIDv7 used for the main Id.
/// </summary>
/// <example>a312cb9c-7632-43c2-aa38-69b06aed56ca</example>
public Guid Revision { get; set; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /// <summary> | |
| /// The unique identifier for the revision in UUIDv4 format. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| /// <example>a312cb9c-7632-43c2-aa38-69b06aed56ca</example> | |
| public Guid Revision { get; set; } | |
| /// <summary> | |
| /// The unique identifier for the revision in UUIDv4 format. UUIDv4 is used for revisions to distinguish them from the UUIDv7 used for the main Id. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| /// <example>a312cb9c-7632-43c2-aa38-69b06aed56ca</example> | |
| public Guid Revision { get; set; } |
oskogstad
changed the title
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [1.20.2](v1.20.1...v1.20.2) (2024-10-02) ### Bug Fixes * (webAPI): Add revision to search dto (ServiceOwner) ([#1216](#1216)) ([3b6d130](3b6d130)) * **graphQL:** GraphQL subscription not notified on DialogActivityCreated ([#1187](#1187)) ([f28e291](f28e291)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Description
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)