-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] SMARTCTL status failed
on 0.4.4 but passed
on 0.3.x
#247
Comments
This is actually a fix not a bug. e780161#diff-2c860daa8b45fb817d063c797dc6ffdfd5ad820504195a2b553fdd9bd26f0b84 Unfortunately for NVMe & SCSI drives, there's not much data from BackBlaze about the real-world failure thresholds, so I'm just using the recommended thresholds to determine success/failure for critical attributes. |
Im guessing this OP is same as me (#187) in that smartctl is reporting "passed" so its a bit confusing Scrutiny says failed. |
Yep, I'm writing a response to you right now @shamoon |
Ha ok thanks. I have one update too I'll post there |
may you add this to some readme/docs, additional documentation related to nvme failure threshold, real world data and how scrutiny determine fail/pass will helpfull prevent confusion and panic attack due sudden failed status. thanks for the supports. |
Yeah, I added a section in the troubleshooting doc to point that out: Do you think there's anything else I should add? |
Thats helpful for sure. But it really does highlight the issue for me. Right now the UI makes it look like SMART is failing, or the device is somehow in danger of failing imminently, when in actual fact correlation (not causation) from data from BB is all its saying. Anyway, I know you know! |
Copying a comment from the SelfHosted Discord #storage channel:
|
Attributes and thresholds with little-no real-world Backblaze data have been loosened so they no longer cause failures. fixed in v0.4.7 🎉 |
Do i need wipe out already collected data? I already upgrade to 0.4.7 and waiting for few hours, with collecting data every 15m. Because it still defined as |
@martadinata666 unfortunately the way the Device status updating code is written, it will not unset a "failed" drive. |
Describe the bug
SMARTCTL status change from passes to failed
Expected behavior
Should be pass? As 0.3.x result pass.
Screenshots
I checked all details the only one got
fail
status isNumb Err Log Entries
everything else ispassed
Log Files
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: