Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

is-23: polynomials viewed as operators #28

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 27, 2023
Merged

is-23: polynomials viewed as operators #28

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 27, 2023

Conversation

Antonio-JP
Copy link
Owner

This pull request will merge the changes necessary to close #23.

In this issue we have address the problem of seeing the operator polynomials in RWOPolynomial as operators. In the linear case, we should be able to transform these into objects in the package ore_algebra and in the non-linear case we are able to compose operators using evaluation.

Added implementation of linear_operator_ring for RingWithOperators_Wrapper

Added conversion from a RingWithOperators_Wrapper to its ring of linear operators.
Added conversion from "RWOPolynomialRing_dense" to the ring of linear operators.

Added the conversion from the ring of linear operators to "RWOPolynomialRing_dense"

Added method "as_linear_operator" that transforms RWOPolynomials to the corresponding (possible) linear operator.
Also added that method in the RWOPolynomial.
_element_constructor_ for RWOPolynomialRing_dense works better in the case of linear operators. It distinguish betwenn univariate and multivariate polynomial interfaces

Added explanation on "eval" about the composition of operators.

Added tests to check this functionality

Fixed error when evaluating expressions.

Added documentation and tests for "as_linear_operator".
Fixed error when having only one operator.
Fixed RWOPolyRingFunctor, now it has a rank and a merge function to merge difference RWOPolyRingFunctor functors
@Antonio-JP Antonio-JP added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 24, 2023
@Antonio-JP Antonio-JP linked an issue Feb 24, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
6 tasks
@Antonio-JP Antonio-JP merged commit 26c5935 into develop Feb 27, 2023
@Antonio-JP Antonio-JP deleted the is-23 branch February 27, 2023 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Objects as operators
1 participant