-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Conversation
@fusion809 can you please check whether the latest binaries work as intended? |
I built it locally with this patch applied, with |
@fusion809 you mean the GLib dependency error? |
Yep. |
Lol I tried to install it on Fedora Rawhide and I received a dependency error too: $ sudo dnf install -y https://github.com/AppImage/appimaged/releases/download/continuous/appimaged-appimaged-1_alpha-gita3b100b.travis57.x86_64.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 19:36:51 ago on Wed 21 Nov 2018 14:57:15 AEST.
appimaged-appimaged-1_alpha-gita3b100b.travis57.x86_64.rpm 29 kB/s | 155 kB 00:05
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libarchive13 needed by appimaged-appimaged-1_alpha-gita3b100b~travis57.x86_64
- nothing provides libglib2.0-0 needed by appimaged-appimaged-1_alpha-gita3b100b~travis57.x86_64
- nothing provides zlib1g needed by appimaged-appimaged-1_alpha-gita3b100b~travis57.x86_64
- nothing provides libc6 >= 2.4 needed by appimaged-appimaged-1_alpha-gita3b100b~travis57.x86_64 |
@fusion809 you should try the one provided in Artifactory. That's where Travis build artifacts are stored (except for release/continuous builds). |
I gave it a go earlier as well, same error, however. |
@fusion809 if you could provide the right package names for the packages listed in that error message, I can try to overwrite them explicitly in the CPack config. |
Funny, RPM itself is meant to detect libraries required by files provided by the package. It does when I package RPM packages using the openSUSE Build Service. For Fedora:
openSUSE:
|
@fusion809 well, that may work if you build distro specific packages on the target distros. We build the RPM packages on Debian, though. Do you think the What's funny is that AppImageLauncher's RPM packages install fine on openSUSE and Fedora (at least when I wrote the config a few months ago...). Anyway, will put together the list for Fedora later. Thanks so far! |
Not sure about |
@TheAssassin did you see that the RPM we are currently generating has a real strange name with the application name 2x in the filename? |
That's something fixed in this PR, too (that |
Is something missing for this to be ready for merging? |
Yes: everything. The dependency issues weren't resolved, and I didn't have any time (and neither wasn't interested enough) to look into this. You're free to investigate this yourself. |
Don't have the time, sorry |
Does any RPM expert volunteer to take this over? |
fixed on #91 |
No description provided.