Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SM: getitem cheat fix #3102

Merged
merged 240 commits into from
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lordlou
Copy link
Contributor

@lordlou lordlou commented Apr 5, 2024

What is this fixing or adding?

fixed !getitem client command not working

How was this tested?

I reproed the issue, made the fix and verified it.

lordlou added 30 commits August 9, 2021 23:32
…VariaRandomizer's rules, items, locations and accessPoint (as regions)
…se (fills ROM item table)

This is dependant on modifications done to sm_randomizer_rom project
- player name inject in ROM and get in client
- end game get from ROM in client
- send self item to server
- add player names table in ROM
…ition of an array of it (required to generation more than one SM world, which is still fails but is better)
- fixed seeded generation
- fixed broken logic when more than one SM world
- added missing rules for inter-area transitions
- added basic patch presence for logic
- added DoorManager init call to reflect present patches for logic
- moved CollectionState addition out of BaseClasses into SM world
- added condition to apply progitempool presorting only if SM world is present
- set Bosses item id to None to prevent them going into multidata
- now use get_game_players
…VariaRandomizer's rules, items, locations and accessPoint (as regions)
…se (fills ROM item table)

This is dependant on modifications done to sm_randomizer_rom project
- player name inject in ROM and get in client
- end game get from ROM in client
- send self item to server
- add player names table in ROM
…ition of an array of it (required to generation more than one SM world, which is still fails but is better)
lordlou added 22 commits May 8, 2023 20:25
@github-actions github-actions bot added the waiting-on: peer-review Issue/PR has not been reviewed by enough people yet. label Apr 5, 2024
@ReverM
Copy link
Contributor

ReverM commented Apr 5, 2024

You might want to consider cleaning up your commit history :p

@alwaysintreble alwaysintreble added the is: bug/fix Issues that are reporting bugs or pull requests that are fixing bugs. label Apr 6, 2024
beauxq added a commit to beauxq/Archipelago that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@beauxq beauxq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The way that I tested this was to put the same change in Subversion's client
and see that it fixes !getitem there.
(since Subversion uses basically the same client code)

@Berserker66 Berserker66 merged commit 3c70621 into ArchipelagoMW:main Apr 18, 2024
15 checks passed
qwint pushed a commit to qwint/Archipelago that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
is: bug/fix Issues that are reporting bugs or pull requests that are fixing bugs. waiting-on: peer-review Issue/PR has not been reviewed by enough people yet.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants