Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core: Removing item_count #3309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

Exempt-Medic
Copy link
Member

@Exempt-Medic Exempt-Medic commented May 16, 2024

What is this fixing or adding?

Removing item_count

How was this tested?

Unit tests, looking for things that use it, and one generation with every world except DKC3.

After this, so far as I can tell, the only things that are deprecated and don't have PRs addressing them are data_version and per_slot_randoms

@github-actions github-actions bot added affects: core Issues/PRs that touch core and may need additional validation. waiting-on: peer-review Issue/PR has not been reviewed by enough people yet. labels May 16, 2024
@ThePhar
Copy link
Member

ThePhar commented May 16, 2024

data_version is removed in #1933, btw.

@black-sliver
Copy link
Member

black-sliver commented May 17, 2024

Hm, I feel like the proper way to remove item count would be

  • hard deprecate (making it fail when running on source)
  • wait for a release
  • remove item count

Wait... Utils.deprecate is the hard deprecation, right? Too early for me. :D

@black-sliver black-sliver merged commit 5a2d839 into ArchipelagoMW:main May 17, 2024
16 checks passed
@Exempt-Medic Exempt-Medic deleted the remove-item_count branch June 1, 2024 13:47
jnschurig pushed a commit to Tranquilite0/Archipelago-SoulBlazer that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
qwint pushed a commit to qwint/Archipelago that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
affects: core Issues/PRs that touch core and may need additional validation. waiting-on: peer-review Issue/PR has not been reviewed by enough people yet.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants