Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - bulkloader builder #6183

Closed
dustymc opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature Request - bulkloader builder #6183

dustymc opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer!

Comments

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Apr 24, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

There was a request for the bulkloader builder to be revised and released with whatever #6171 or #5331 might become during last CT meeting.

Describe what you're trying to accomplish

Provide a place to get a partial/customized bulkloader template

Describe the solution you'd like

I need to know what's necessary in order to build tools (and that may be unknowable until the structure is settled??)

@ccicero

Describe alternatives you've considered

?

Additional context

See above

Priority

?

@dustymc dustymc added the Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! label Apr 24, 2023
@dustymc dustymc added this to the Needs Discussion milestone Apr 24, 2023
@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

When we were looking at the column headers we grouped them as follows:

General
Identifier
Identification

Identification Attribute
Agent
Locality
Locality Attribute
coordinate
Event
Event Attribute
Record Event
Attribute
Part
Part Attribute

I think that to start providing this list and allowing one to choose the number of each makes sense. Some will automatically be "1" as some information from the section is required to bulkload. That being said - it would also be interesting to have an option for "minimum data required".

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dustymc commented Apr 24, 2023

minimum data required

That would vary by collection settings, but

*accn
*guid_prefix
*enteredby

should be close if the structure ends up anything like the latest proposal. I think all the proposals add up to very few data constraints, which I'm assuming is clearly understood by the folks who have approval powers.....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants