Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Common: CADDXFPV gimbal setup #6441

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rmackay9
Copy link
Contributor

This is slightly premature considering we don't have the driver completely working yet but I would like to know if @Hwurzburg thinks the wiring is correct or do I have the RX and TX lines backwards?

@Hwurzburg
Copy link
Contributor

Hwurzburg commented Dec 11, 2024

I think that they are backwards, but I could be wrong...I only tried one way(duh)...I can rewire and try the other way today...

@rmackay9
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Hwurzburg, or make use of the SERIALx_OPTIONS to flip them in software. I'll continue working on this today as well so surely we will get to the bottom of it

@rmackay9
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Hwurzburg,

I think the diagram included in this PR has the TX and RX mapped correctly. I've asked CADDX so hopefully they will tell us directly but we have this picture in the manual.

image

Then when it discusses the MAVLink interface (which we're not using but surely the pin mapping is the same) it says UART_RX and UART_TX should be mapped to the autopilot's TX and RX respectively.

image

@Hwurzburg
Copy link
Contributor

I just used the pin marked RX on the gimbal to the autopilot TX since its one way for control....so I had that correct, but still no communication

@rmackay9
Copy link
Contributor Author

rmackay9 commented Jan 2, 2025

Hi @Hwurzburg,

How do you feel about merging this? I'd like to get it into the wiki even though 4.7 is not out because it gives alpha/beta testers the info they need to test and use it.

@Hwurzburg
Copy link
Contributor

I will add to upcoming....getting beta testers will be more effective with a BLOG post referring to this....however,I can rework this to add it in the wiki for display and you then it will appear nice to those following the link, but not be confused as if it were in stable

@Hwurzburg
Copy link
Contributor

fixed up and corrected a build error (CI does not catch TOC errors)....merging....you can refer to the wiki HTML page in your blog post once it builds

@Hwurzburg Hwurzburg merged commit 40dd111 into ArduPilot:master Jan 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@rmackay9
Copy link
Contributor Author

rmackay9 commented Jan 3, 2025

@Hwurzburg thanks so much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants