Added some quality of life tooling #252
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
psvenk
requested changes
Feb 2, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here are some suggested style changes. However, this begs the question: is it really necessary to have SSL certificate tooling for development use? There is no real point in using HTTPS when connections are typically not even exposed to a LAN, much less the Internet.
|
@psvenk I wanted to have this for when I work on the server.js and want to on https, wanted to allow others to do it easily as well. |
psvenk
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2021
psvenk
reviewed
Feb 2, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Generate self signed certs for tests easily.