This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
Update eslint to version 3.0.1 🚀 #111
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Arcanemagus
force-pushed
the
greenkeeper-eslint-3.0.1
branch
from
3519b21 to
3589bbd
Compare
This rule can't be configured to account for the 'atom' dependency being resolvable but not listed.
|
Blocked on atom/ci#43. |
This was referenced Jul 15, 2016
|
This PR is superseded by #119. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello lovely humans,
eslint just published its new version 3.0.1.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project ✨
You rock!
🌴
GitHub Release
no-unused-varsfalse positive around callback (fixes #6576) (#6579) (Toru Nagashima)no-unused-varsignore for-in (fixes #2342) (#6126) (Oleg Gaidarenko)outerIIFEBodyinindent(fixes #6581) (#6584) (alberto)max-len(fixes #6564) (#6565) (not-an-aardvark)The new version differs by 156 commits .
0fd4b6d3.0.1ebf2987Build: package.json and changelog update for 3.0.127700cfFix:no-unused-varsfalse positive around callback (fixes #6576) (#6579)124d8a3Docs: Pull request template (#6568)e9a2ed9Docs: Fix rules\id-length exceptions typos (fixes #6397) (#6593)a2cfa1bFix: Make outerIIFEBody work correctly (fixes #6585) (#6596)9c451a2Docs: Use string severity in example (#6601)8308c0bChore: remove path-is-absolute in favor of the built-in (fixes #6598) (#6600)7a63717Docs: Add missing pull request step (fixes #6595) (#6597)de3ed84Fix: makeno-unused-varsignore for-in (fixes #2342) (#6126)6ef2cbeFix: strip Unicode BOM of config files (fixes #6556) (#6580)ee7fcfaDocs: Correct type ofouterIIFEBodyinindent(fixes #6581) (#6584)25fc7b7Fix: false negative ofmax-len(fixes #6564) (#6565)f6b8452Docs: Distinguish examples in rules under Stylistic Issues part 6 (#6567)5ec54be3.0.0There are 156 commits in total. See the full diff.
This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡
greenkeeper upgrade