feat: bulk delete in backlog mass select #413
Merged
+223
−43
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Introduced a new endpoint `/bulk-delete` to allow deletion of multiple features at once. - Implemented `createBulkDeleteHandler` to process bulk delete requests and handle success/failure responses. - Updated the UI to include a bulk delete option in the BoardView component, with confirmation dialog for user actions. - Enhanced the HTTP API client to support bulk delete requests. - Improved the selection action bar to trigger bulk delete functionality and provide user feedback.
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis diff introduces a project dashboard, memory and graph views, Codex model caching, per-project spec regeneration tracking, auto-mode state persistence with resume capability, a UX reviewer enhancement mode, bulk feature deletion, and an OpenCode provider event model overhaul. AI profiles feature is removed entirely. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 5 (Critical) | ⏱️ ~120 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
✨ Finishing touches
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (143)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Contributor
Summary of ChangesHello @Shironex, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request delivers a suite of new features and significant architectural improvements, primarily focusing on enhancing AI model integration, project management, and application stability. It introduces robust mechanisms for managing Codex models and project-specific processes, alongside a new user interface for memory management and a streamlined project dashboard. The changes also include a major overhaul of how AI profiles are handled, shifting towards direct model configuration, and several quality-of-life improvements for developers and users alike. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a bulk delete functionality for features, which is a great addition for managing the backlog. The changes span both the backend and frontend, adding a new API endpoint and integrating it into the UI's mass selection action bar.
My review focuses on improving the performance and correctness of the implementation. I've suggested parallelizing the delete operations on the server for better performance and fixing a logic issue in the frontend to correctly handle partial success scenarios and avoid redundant API calls. These changes will make the new feature more robust and efficient.
This was referenced Jan 11, 2026
Merged
This was referenced Jan 19, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.