-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix populate called with lean (gh-14794) #14799
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple of quick changes, #14759 made us very wary of cases where we may accidentally be checking for quality on _id
after getters applied, so we want to avoid undoing the val._doc._id
changes in cases where we know val instanceof Document
.
Thanks for finding the issue
lib/model.js
Outdated
@@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ function _assign(model, vals, mod, assignmentOpts) { | |||
} | |||
} else { | |||
if (_val instanceof Document) { | |||
_val = _val._doc._id; | |||
_val = _val._id; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change isn't necessary. L4462 will never run if lean.
lib/model.js
Outdated
@@ -4468,7 +4468,7 @@ function _assign(model, vals, mod, assignmentOpts) { | |||
rawOrder[key].push(i); | |||
} else if (isVirtual || | |||
rawDocs[key].constructor !== val.constructor || | |||
String(rawDocs[key]._doc._id) !== String(val._doc._id)) { | |||
String(rawDocs[key]._id) !== String(val._id)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we expand this change to check if rawDocs[key]
and val
are instanceof Document
, and, if so, use val._doc._id
, otherwise val._id
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, for this would you prefer it be a ternary operator inside the else if check like this
(rawDocs[key] instanceof Document ? String(rawDocs[key]._doc._id) : String(rawDocs[key]._id)) !== (val instanceof Document ? String(val._doc._id) : String(val._id))
which looks kind of long and hard to read or move them to constant above the if check like this
const rawDocId = rawDocs[key] instanceof Document ? rawDocs[key]._doc._id : rawDocs[key]._id;
const valDocId = val instanceof Document ? val._doc._id : val._id;
// rest of the code
String(rawDocId) !== String(valDocId)
both are fine and would do the same thing, I just don't wanna keep pushing commits since the CI would rerun
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went for the the first approach currently, just to move things forward, if it needs refactoring please let me know
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See previous comments, I accidentally submitted review with "Comment" selected rather than "Request changes"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 👍
Summary
in #14794 due to being called with
lean()
there's no_doc
object so that throws an erroranother issue here is documents with duplicate foreignField so the
rawDocs[key]
already exists and its value is being overwritten.this change shouldn't affect (gh-14759) and its test case still runs successfully.
another solution would be to check for
rawDocs[key]._id
andval._doc
first using the following statement instead