Save time of navdata packet reception and use to stamp ros messages #43
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before, we were stamping the /ardrone/navdata,mag,imu messages with the time that they were processed in the main ros loop. This caused unnecessary delays in the timestamp. Now we save the time of navdata reception in the navdata handling loop, which is then used to stamp the output messages when processed by the loop.
|
This is not needed because of #44. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This partially addresses #42 by somewhat mitigating the problem of loop delay.
Before, we were stamping the /ardrone/navdata,mag,imu messages with the time that they were processed in the main ros loop. This caused unnecessary delays in the timestamp. Now we save the time of navdata reception in the navdata handling loop, which is then used to stamp the output messages when processed by the loop.
This is a separate pull_request because it's trivial. See more improvements in my next pull request.