Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove xcmp_handler in benchmark workflow #468

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

imstar15
Copy link
Member

@imstar15 imstar15 commented Nov 28, 2023

We have removed the benchmarking.rs file from the xcmp_handler pallet in the following PR because all extrinsic call interfaces (such as set_asset_config) have been removed from this pallet.

#366

There is no need to specify running benchmarks for this pallet in benchmark.yml anymore.

Because the benchmarking.rs file no longer exists, an error will occur when GitHub Actions run.

https://github.com/OAK-Foundation/OAK-blockchain/actions/runs/7014798037/job/19083688075

@imstar15 imstar15 requested a review from chrisli30 November 28, 2023 14:11
Copy link
Member

@chrisli30 chrisli30 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@imstar15 can you remember to add explanation to your PRs? Why do we need to remove xcm_handler?

@imstar15
Copy link
Member Author

@imstar15 can you remember to add explanation to your PRs? Why do we need to remove xcm_handler?

Sorry. I added explanation.

@imstar15 imstar15 requested a review from chrisli30 November 29, 2023 01:48
Copy link
Member

@chrisli30 chrisli30 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, the explanation is clear. 👌

@imstar15 imstar15 merged commit 59b6193 into master Nov 29, 2023
3 checks passed
@imstar15 imstar15 deleted the remove-xcmp-handler-benchmark branch November 29, 2023 01:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants