Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not throw on public simulation error #4971

Closed
Tracked by #4096
just-mitch opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4870
Closed
Tracked by #4096

Do not throw on public simulation error #4971

just-mitch opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4870
Assignees

Comments

@just-mitch
Copy link
Collaborator

just-mitch commented Mar 6, 2024

Presently, we always throw whenever there is an error while simulating public functions. We want to include transactions that revert during app logic, so this must be changed to gracefully handle public reverts.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Todo in A3 Mar 6, 2024
@just-mitch just-mitch linked a pull request Mar 6, 2024 that will close this issue
@just-mitch just-mitch self-assigned this Mar 6, 2024
@just-mitch just-mitch added this to the ITN - Fees milestone Mar 6, 2024
just-mitch added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
Fix #4971 , Parent issue is #4096

This PR adds basic support for reversions of public functions.

A public function may be simulated locally before the TX is submitted.
In this case, the PXE calls out to the node, requesting public
simulation.

When this is done, the node will throw an error if the public function
would revert.

However, if the function is called with `skipPublicSimulation`, the TX
is submitted, and the sequencer will run the public processor, which
catches `SimulationErrors`, and includes them in the rollup.

Generally this is accomplished by adding a `reverted` boolean to the
`PublicCircuitPublicInputs` and `PublicKernelCircuitPublicInputs`.

It is expected that the AVM will set its `reverted` flag to true. In the
meantime, while simulating with the acvm, if it throws, we catch, and
set the flag on the output to `true`.

There is also a `revertedReason`, which is useful for debugging (e.g.
when you simulate public functions locally, you want the node to return
a meaningful error to you)

The meat of the logic changes are in `public_kernel_app_logic.nr`,
`abstract_phase_manager.ts`, and `app_logic_phase_manager.ts`.

The primary test is in `e2e_fees.test.ts`.

In the app logic circuit, we now check to see if we have reverted, and
forward the flag if so. Additionally, if we have reverted, we do not
propagate forward any revertible side effects, and instead leave them
all to zero.

Note further, if we get a simulation error in a **nested** public
execution, we **do throw**, and allow the parent/top-level call to catch
the error and return gracefully.

I also added a bunch of inspect functions, and assertions about hashes
for sanity checking.

# Future work

Presently if a tx reverts but is included, it is not distinguished from
other transactions in the block which did not revert. This will be fixed
as part of #4972

Further, to test the flow where we **privately** pay the fee but then
have a revert, we need to first tackle
#4712 so that we
have "non-revertible" logs (unshield is used in fee prep in this case,
which emits encrypted logs, which are presently dropped if the
transaction reverts).

Additionally, as mentioned in comments below, we do not yet insist that
the non-revertible parts of public execution in fact do not revert. This
will be done in
#5038.

All of those are tracked as part of the parent issue #4096

We will also want to optimize the public kernel circuits, but I am in
favor of adding the bare minimum feature set before we start optimizing.
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in A3 Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant