Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: interaction for a mock first circuit handled inside the EccOpQueue #4854

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

maramihali
Copy link
Contributor

@maramihali maramihali commented Feb 29, 2024

Closes AztecProtocol/barretenberg#723.

Because of issues with handling zero-commitments, we need to populate the EccOpQueue with some mock ops from a first circuit in order for the first merge prover to work without problems. This was done client-side which required manually calling either GoblinMockCircuits::perform_op_queue_interactions_for_mock_first_circuit or op_queue->populate_with_mock_initital_data (two functions for the same purpose) everywhere goblin and the merge protocol is used/tested. This PR ensures only GoblinMockCircuits::perform_op_queue_interactions_for_mock_first_circuit is used across the codebase since it's the one updating both ultra_ops and raw_ops, removing the other function, and isolates mocking inside the Goblin class so it doesn't have to be done in benchmarks.

Note: tried to isolate it inside EccOpQueue, which is possible but then requires us to have an op_offset (from which non-mocked operations start) which complicates some code and tests unnecessarily.

@maramihali maramihali self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
@maramihali maramihali added the crypto cryptography label Feb 29, 2024
*
* @param op_queue
*/
void populate_with_mock_initital_data()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

moved this at the end of the file as a private function

@maramihali maramihali changed the title refactor: interaction for a mock first circuit handled inside the ECCOPQueue refactor: interaction for a mock first circuit handled inside the EccOpQueue Feb 29, 2024
@maramihali maramihali marked this pull request as ready for review February 29, 2024 13:10
@@ -120,11 +129,7 @@ class ECCOpQueue {
[[nodiscard]] size_t get_previous_size() const { return previous_ultra_ops_size; }
[[nodiscard]] size_t get_current_size() const { return current_ultra_ops_size; }

void set_commitment_data(std::array<Point, 4>& commitments)
{
previous_ultra_ops_commitments = ultra_ops_commitments;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nothing actually uses previous_ultra_ops_commitments (the merge prover considers C_T_prev to be ultra_ops_commitments) so removed the field

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sweet

Copy link
Contributor

@ledwards2225 ledwards2225 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I may be missing something but I expected that the mocked ops would need to be valid in order for the ECCVM to fail. The fact that this isn't causing any problems is concerning. What am I missing?

@@ -120,11 +129,7 @@ class ECCOpQueue {
[[nodiscard]] size_t get_previous_size() const { return previous_ultra_ops_size; }
[[nodiscard]] size_t get_current_size() const { return current_ultra_ops_size; }

void set_commitment_data(std::array<Point, 4>& commitments)
{
previous_ultra_ops_commitments = ultra_ops_commitments;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sweet

@maramihali maramihali requested a review from ledwards2225 March 8, 2024 18:39
@AztecBot
Copy link
Collaborator

AztecBot commented Mar 8, 2024

Benchmark results

Metrics with a significant change:

  • note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms (32): 98.1 (+110%)
Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Values are compared against data from master at commit 58e15edf and shown if the difference exceeds 1%.

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric 8 txs 32 txs 64 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes 5,668 18,820 36,356
l1_rollup_calldata_gas 66,040 238,360 468,716
l1_rollup_execution_gas 666,672 953,221 1,336,024
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms 1,268 (-3%) 4,694 (-3%) 9,183 (+2%)
note_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 134 (-4%) 482 (-10%) 940 (-2%)
note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 40.0 (-9%) ⚠️ 98.1 (+110%) 73.1 (-17%)
l2_block_building_time_in_ms 16,901 (-1%) 67,313 (-1%) 134,689
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms 6,955 (-2%) 27,813 (-1%) 55,811
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms 9,919 (-1%) 39,444 (-1%) 78,778

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.

Metric 5 blocks 10 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms 13,491 (-3%) 26,417 (+1%)
note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 1,195 (+1%) 2,494 (+4%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 67.7 (+1%) 152 (+25%)
node_database_size_in_bytes 19,046,480 35,635,280
pxe_database_size_in_bytes 29,859 59,414

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit circuit_simulation_time_in_ms circuit_input_size_in_bytes circuit_output_size_in_bytes
private-kernel-init 278 44,338 27,700
private-kernel-ordering 217 52,324 14,326
base-rollup 632 177,083 925
root-rollup 68.0 (-1%) 4,176 789
private-kernel-inner 633 73,197 27,700
public-kernel-app-logic 439 35,198 28,215
public-kernel-tail 177 40,926 28,215
merge-rollup 8.29 2,696 925

Tree insertion stats

The duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.

Metric 1 leaves 16 leaves 64 leaves 128 leaves 512 leaves 1024 leaves 2048 leaves 4096 leaves 32 leaves
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_ms 9.94 (-1%) 15.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_count 16.8 31.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_ms 0.580 (-1%) 0.492 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_ms N/A N/A 45.7 71.8 (-1%) 229 442 863 (-1%) 1,713 N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_count N/A N/A 96.0 159 543 1,055 2,079 4,127 N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A 0.469 0.444 (-1%) 0.418 0.414 0.411 0.411 N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_ms N/A N/A 53.7 106 333 656 1,304 (-1%) 2,600 (-1%) N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_count N/A N/A 104 207 691 1,363 2,707 5,395 N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A 0.478 0.478 (-1%) 0.454 0.453 0.452 (-1%) 0.453 N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 61.1
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_count N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 109
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.535

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contract classes are registered in the tx.

Metric 0 registered classes
tx_size_in_bytes 22,014

Transaction processing duration by data writes.

Metric 0 new note hashes 1 new note hashes
tx_pxe_processing_time_ms 3,964 1,731
Metric 0 public data writes 1 public data writes
tx_sequencer_processing_time_ms 11.0 (-15%) 1,229

using VerifierInstance = bb::VerifierInstance_<Flavor>;
using RecursiveVerifierInstance = ::bb::stdlib::recursion::honk::RecursiveVerifierInstance_<RecursiveFlavor>;
using RecursiveVerifierAccumulator = std::shared_ptr<RecursiveVerifierInstance>;
using VerificationKey = Flavor::VerificationKey;
static constexpr size_t NUM_OP_QUEUE_COLUMNS = Flavor::NUM_WIRES;

struct KernelInput {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To mock inside Goblin I had to break the dependency between MockCircuits and Goblin (to avoid a circular dependency)

@@ -140,6 +140,13 @@ bool proveAndVerify(const std::string& bytecodePath, const std::string& witnessP
*/
bool accumulateAndVerifyGoblin(const std::string& bytecodePath, const std::string& witnessPath)
{
// TODO(https://github.com/AztecProtocol/barretenberg/issues/811): Don't hardcode dyadic circuit size. Currently set
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GoblinAcirComposer initialises Goblin which calls the perform_op_queue_interactions_for_mock_first_circuit function so the crs needs to be initalised prior to this. Not sure if there's a better way to achieve this

Copy link
Contributor

@ledwards2225 ledwards2225 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just a couple of small comments/requests

goblin.merge_proof_exists = false;
GoblinMockCircuits::perform_op_queue_interactions_for_mock_first_circuit(goblin.op_queue);
// Clean the Goblin state (reinitialise op_queue with mocking and clear merge proofs)
goblin = Goblin();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems a bit weird to me. I know it's not being introduced in this PR but is there some reason why we don't simply instantiate a new goblin instance for use within the scope of this function?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added to do to aim to move vk precomputaion out of client ivc

@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ class Goblin {
AccumulationOutput accumulator; // Used only for ACIR methods for now

public:
Goblin() { GoblinMockCircuits::perform_op_queue_interactions_for_mock_first_circuit(op_queue); }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add the appropriate TODO with issue here?

@maramihali maramihali enabled auto-merge (squash) March 12, 2024 19:48
@maramihali maramihali merged commit d9cbdc8 into master Mar 12, 2024
94 of 95 checks passed
@maramihali maramihali deleted the mm/initial-merge branch March 12, 2024 20:15
critesjosh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-package: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](aztec-package-v0.27.1...aztec-package-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](barretenberg.js-v0.27.1...barretenberg.js-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Miscellaneous

* **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](aztec-cli-v0.27.1...aztec-cli-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-cli:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](aztec-packages-v0.27.1...aztec-packages-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Features

* Check initialization arguments in constructors
([#5144](#5144))
([d003bd6](d003bd6))
* Multithreaded prover folding
([#5147](#5147))
([94922fc](94922fc))
* Run tests in parallel in `nargo test`
(noir-lang/noir#4484)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Track stack frames and their variables in the debugger
(noir-lang/noir#4188)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))


### Bug Fixes

* **acir_gen:** More granular element sizes array check
(noir-lang/noir#4528)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Add `follow_bindings` to follow `Type::Alias` links
(noir-lang/noir#4521)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Allow type aliases in main
(noir-lang/noir#4505)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Constant gen
([#5172](#5172))
([394a0e0](394a0e0))
* **docs:** Update quickstart.md
([#5021](#5021))
([be9f8a1](be9f8a1))
* Dynamic assert messages in brillig
(noir-lang/noir#4531)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Fix brillig slowdown when assigning arrays in loops
(noir-lang/noir#4472)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Fix deployments
([#5183](#5183))
([596253b](596253b))
* Force src impl for == on slices
(noir-lang/noir#4507)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Handling of gh deps in noir_wasm
(noir-lang/noir#4499)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Intermittent invert 0 in Goblin
([#5174](#5174))
([3e68b49](3e68b49))
* Iterative flattening pass
(noir-lang/noir#4492)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Noir mirror merge strat
([#5166](#5166))
([74fa8d6](74fa8d6))
* **ssa:** Handle mergers of slices returned from calls
(noir-lang/noir#4496)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))


### Miscellaneous

* Add `ModuleDeclaration` struct
(noir-lang/noir#4512)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Add HashMap docs (noir-lang/noir#4457)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Add regression test for issue 4449
(noir-lang/noir#4503)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Better output in ci_deploy_contracts.sh
([#5171](#5171))
([8d73f8a](8d73f8a))
* Bump bb to 0.26.3 (noir-lang/noir#4488)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* **ci:** Fix JS publishing workflow checking out inconsistent commits
(noir-lang/noir#4493)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Custom hash for eddsa (noir-lang/noir#4440)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Deterministic mode
([#5155](#5155))
([e68b56a](e68b56a))
* Document big integers (noir-lang/noir#4487)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Generalise `FunctionVisibility` to `ItemVisibility`
(noir-lang/noir#4495)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Interaction for a mock first circuit handled inside the `EccOpQueue`
([#4854](#4854))
([d9cbdc8](d9cbdc8))
* Move `check_method_signatures` to type checking phase
(noir-lang/noir#4516)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Move templated code for assert_message into the stdlib
(noir-lang/noir#4475)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Organize the `blackbox_solver` crate
(noir-lang/noir#4519)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Pass `import_directive` by reference
(noir-lang/noir#4511)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Pass macro processors by reference
(noir-lang/noir#4501)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Pull out separate function for compiling and running a test
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Release Noir(0.25.0) (noir-lang/noir#4352)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Update cargo deny config (noir-lang/noir#4486)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
* Update various dependencies
(noir-lang/noir#4513)
([58e15ed](58e15ed))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](barretenberg-v0.27.1...barretenberg-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Features

* Multithreaded prover folding
([#5147](#5147))
([94922fc](94922fc))


### Bug Fixes

* Intermittent invert 0 in Goblin
([#5174](#5174))
([3e68b49](3e68b49))


### Miscellaneous

* Interaction for a mock first circuit handled inside the `EccOpQueue`
([#4854](#4854))
([d9cbdc8](d9cbdc8))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
AztecBot added a commit to AztecProtocol/barretenberg that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-package: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-package-v0.27.1...aztec-package-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg.js-v0.27.1...barretenberg.js-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Miscellaneous

* **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-cli-v0.27.1...aztec-cli-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-cli:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-packages-v0.27.1...aztec-packages-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Features

* Check initialization arguments in constructors
([#5144](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5144))
([d003bd6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@d003bd6))
* Multithreaded prover folding
([#5147](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5147))
([94922fc](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@94922fc))
* Run tests in parallel in `nargo test`
(noir-lang/noir#4484)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Track stack frames and their variables in the debugger
(noir-lang/noir#4188)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))


### Bug Fixes

* **acir_gen:** More granular element sizes array check
(noir-lang/noir#4528)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Add `follow_bindings` to follow `Type::Alias` links
(noir-lang/noir#4521)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Allow type aliases in main
(noir-lang/noir#4505)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Constant gen
([#5172](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5172))
([394a0e0](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@394a0e0))
* **docs:** Update quickstart.md
([#5021](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5021))
([be9f8a1](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@be9f8a1))
* Dynamic assert messages in brillig
(noir-lang/noir#4531)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Fix brillig slowdown when assigning arrays in loops
(noir-lang/noir#4472)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Fix deployments
([#5183](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5183))
([596253b](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@596253b))
* Force src impl for == on slices
(noir-lang/noir#4507)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Handling of gh deps in noir_wasm
(noir-lang/noir#4499)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Intermittent invert 0 in Goblin
([#5174](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5174))
([3e68b49](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3e68b49))
* Iterative flattening pass
(noir-lang/noir#4492)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Noir mirror merge strat
([#5166](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5166))
([74fa8d6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@74fa8d6))
* **ssa:** Handle mergers of slices returned from calls
(noir-lang/noir#4496)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))


### Miscellaneous

* Add `ModuleDeclaration` struct
(noir-lang/noir#4512)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Add HashMap docs (noir-lang/noir#4457)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Add regression test for issue 4449
(noir-lang/noir#4503)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Better output in ci_deploy_contracts.sh
([#5171](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5171))
([8d73f8a](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@8d73f8a))
* Bump bb to 0.26.3 (noir-lang/noir#4488)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* **ci:** Fix JS publishing workflow checking out inconsistent commits
(noir-lang/noir#4493)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Custom hash for eddsa (noir-lang/noir#4440)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Deterministic mode
([#5155](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5155))
([e68b56a](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@e68b56a))
* Document big integers (noir-lang/noir#4487)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Generalise `FunctionVisibility` to `ItemVisibility`
(noir-lang/noir#4495)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Interaction for a mock first circuit handled inside the `EccOpQueue`
([#4854](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4854))
([d9cbdc8](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@d9cbdc8))
* Move `check_method_signatures` to type checking phase
(noir-lang/noir#4516)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Move templated code for assert_message into the stdlib
(noir-lang/noir#4475)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Organize the `blackbox_solver` crate
(noir-lang/noir#4519)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Pass `import_directive` by reference
(noir-lang/noir#4511)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Pass macro processors by reference
(noir-lang/noir#4501)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Pull out separate function for compiling and running a test
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Release Noir(0.25.0) (noir-lang/noir#4352)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Update cargo deny config (noir-lang/noir#4486)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
* Update various dependencies
(noir-lang/noir#4513)
([58e15ed](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e15ed))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.27.2</summary>

##
[0.27.2](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg-v0.27.1...barretenberg-v0.27.2)
(2024-03-13)


### Features

* Multithreaded prover folding
([#5147](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5147))
([94922fc](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@94922fc))


### Bug Fixes

* Intermittent invert 0 in Goblin
([#5174](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5174))
([3e68b49](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3e68b49))


### Miscellaneous

* Interaction for a mock first circuit handled inside the `EccOpQueue`
([#4854](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4854))
([d9cbdc8](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@d9cbdc8))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
maramihali added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2024
PR #4854 removed the mocking function from the `EccOpQueue`
`populate_with_mock_initital_data` which was stale and only populating
the `ultra_ops` rather than both `raw_ops` and `ultra_ops` and ensured
mocking (required to avoid commitments to 0) is done everywhere with a
single function
`GoblinMockCircuits::perform_op_queue_interactions_for_mock_first_circuit(op_queue);`.
A mis-merge reintroduced `populate_with_mock_initital_data` so removing
again.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
crypto cryptography
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Op Queue Aggregation Limitations
3 participants