-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 741
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding support for Unix time formatted dates in C# #948
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1833d26
Adding a new primary type for unix time and updating namers to handle…
tbombach 166ff89
Updating test server to add test scenarios for unix time
tbombach 59d3fa9
Adding test for Unix time encoded values in path
tbombach 5577875
Updating test coverage list
tbombach 6981bc8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/Azure/master' into issue-909
tbombach 1819c56
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/Azure/master' into issue-909
tbombach dccbc73
Simplifying the logic for determining SerializationSettings
tbombach File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ public enum KnownPrimaryType | |
Boolean, | ||
Credentials, | ||
Uuid, | ||
Base64Url | ||
Base64Url, | ||
UnixTime | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@markcowl Mark, could you take a quick look at the changes I made in this last commit whenever it's convenient for you?
For context, MethodTemplateModel.GetSerializationSettingsReference() is getting too complex and failing a build rule for code complexity (and it's hard to read). I simplified this logic by adding methods to check if an IType either is a KnownPrimaryType or is a dictionary/sequence that is based on the KnownPrimaryType (previously these checks were repeated for each primary type that had special serialization behavior).
Tests are passing and the serialization is working the same as before. I'd like another set of eyes on it before I merge to make sure I kept the behavior the same with respect to the null checks. Thanks!