Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding aggregate(CountAsync/SumAsync etc.) extensions for LINQ query #729

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 27, 2019

Conversation

simplynaveen20
Copy link
Member

@simplynaveen20 simplynaveen20 commented Aug 22, 2019

Pull Request Template

Description

This PR will add various mathematical extension methods for LINQ operations.
CountAsync(),SumAsync(),AverageAsync(),MinAsync(),MaxAsync()
Example -
IOrderedQueryable linqQueryable = this.Container.GetItemLinqQueryable();
int sum = await linqQueryable.Select(item => item.taskNum).SumAsync();

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Closing issues

#589

@simplynaveen20 simplynaveen20 self-assigned this Aug 22, 2019
@simplynaveen20 simplynaveen20 changed the title Adding compute(CountAsync/SumAsync etc.) extensions on for LINQ query Adding compute(CountAsync/SumAsync etc.) extensions for LINQ query Aug 22, 2019
@simplynaveen20 simplynaveen20 changed the title Adding compute(CountAsync/SumAsync etc.) extensions for LINQ query Adding aggregate(CountAsync/SumAsync etc.) extensions for LINQ query Aug 23, 2019
@kirankumarkolli kirankumarkolli merged commit 2fa8713 into master Aug 27, 2019
@kirankumarkolli kirankumarkolli deleted the users/nakumar/LinqCountAsyncFix branch August 27, 2019 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants