Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add nullable http proto #6585

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2020
Merged

Add nullable http proto #6585

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2020

Conversation

mhoeger
Copy link
Contributor

@mhoeger mhoeger commented Sep 2, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Adding an alternative to map

resolves Azure/azure-functions-language-worker-protobuf#49

Related to:
Azure/azure-functions-language-worker-protobuf#50
Azure/azure-functions-nodejs-worker#326

Pull request checklist

  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
    • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

Additional information

Additional PR information

@mhoeger mhoeger mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2020
Merged
@mhoeger mhoeger requested a review from yojagad September 2, 2020 07:12
@mhoeger mhoeger mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2020
Merged
@mhoeger mhoeger merged commit 7c81c0d into dev Sep 16, 2020
@mhoeger mhoeger deleted the mhoeger/newProtoHeaders branch September 16, 2020 01:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@yojagad yojagad yojagad approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add alternative for headers and query for RpcHttp that don't rely on "map"
2 participants
@mhoeger @yojagad