Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding specialization simulation middleware #9618

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kshyju
Copy link
Member

@kshyju kshyju commented Oct 16, 2023

Adding code to simulate placeholder and specialization locallly.
Added 2 new configurations "DebugPlaceholder" and "ReleasePlaceholder". When building the code using any of this configurations, the necessary code to simulate placeholder & specialization will be included in the compilation.

Pull request checklist

  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
    • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
  • My changes do not require diagnostic events changes
    • Otherwise: I have added/updated all related diagnostic events and their documentation (Documentation issue linked to PR)
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

Additional information

Additional PR information

@kshyju kshyju marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2023 21:53
@kshyju kshyju requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2023 21:53
@kshyju kshyju requested a review from fabiocav October 16, 2023 21:54
@kshyju kshyju merged commit 97613c6 into dev Oct 16, 2023
9 checks passed
@kshyju kshyju deleted the shkr/specialization-mdlwr branch October 16, 2023 22:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants