Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Temporarily disable billing resource capture for 0.6.0 #228

Merged

Conversation

Elsie4ever
Copy link
Contributor

billing service extension will be temporarily disabled in release 0.6.0 and the structure will be update. On CLI side we will also disable billing resource capture for 0.6.0 until new service extension gets enable again
image
image


This project has adopted the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct. For more information see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact opencode@microsoft.com with any additional questions or comments.

Thank you for contributing to Azure IoT Operations tooling!

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

General Guidelines

Intent for Production

  • It is expected that pull requests made to default or core branches such as dev or main are of production grade. Corollary to this, any merged contributions to these branches may be deployed in a public release at any given time. By checking this box, you agree and commit to the expected production quality of code.

Basic expectations

  • If introducing new functionality or modified behavior, are they backed by unit and/or integration tests?
  • In the same context as above are command names and their parameter definitions accurate? Do help docs have sufficient content?
  • Have all the relevant unit and integration tests pass? i.e. pytest <project root> -vv. Please provide evidence in the form of a screenshot showing a succesful run of tests locally OR a link to a test pipeline that has been run against the change-set.
  • Have linter checks passed using the .pylintrc and .flake8 rules? Look at the CI scripts for example usage.
  • Have extraneous print or debug statements, commented out code-blocks or code-statements (if any) been removed from the surface area of changes?
  • Have you made an entry in HISTORY.rst which concisely explains your user-facing feature or change?

Azure IoT Operations CLI maintainers reserve the right to enforce any of the outlined expectations.

A PR is considered ready for review when all basic expectations have been met (or do not apply).

@Elsie4ever
Copy link
Contributor Author

int test passed
image

@Elsie4ever Elsie4ever marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2024 18:13
@Elsie4ever Elsie4ever requested a review from digimaun as a code owner May 31, 2024 18:13
@digimaun digimaun added the wait label May 31, 2024
@digimaun digimaun removed the wait label Jun 14, 2024
@Elsie4ever
Copy link
Contributor Author

test runs after change~
image

@digimaun digimaun changed the base branch from dev to feature/0.6.0 June 14, 2024 20:50
@Elsie4ever Elsie4ever merged commit 023e14c into Azure:feature/0.6.0 Jun 14, 2024
17 checks passed
c-ryan-k pushed a commit to c-ryan-k/azure-iot-ops-cli-extension that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2024
…re#228)

* Temporarily disable billing resource capture for 0.6.0
c-ryan-k pushed a commit to c-ryan-k/azure-iot-ops-cli-extension that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2024
…re#228)

* Temporarily disable billing resource capture for 0.6.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants