Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove open with retry in test logic and remove dead code #569

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 8, 2019

Conversation

timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member

@timtay-microsoft timtay-microsoft commented Aug 2, 2019

With Amqp fixes to the open logic, e2e tests no longer need any sort of retry logic for the open calls.

Intertest delays were set to 0 anyways, so all references to them have now been removed

Ensured that e2e test tear down code cannot cause the test it is tearing down to fail

@timtay-microsoft timtay-microsoft changed the title Remove open with retry in test logic Remove open with retry in test logic and remove dead code Aug 2, 2019
@timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run Java Canary

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run Java Canary Basic

@timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run Java Prod Basic

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run SDL

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

With amqp fixes, open call should just work now
…elays are 0 seconds

Also prevent tests from failing due to the tear down logic failing
@timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 5 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Contributor

@jasmineymlo jasmineymlo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants