Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc(device, e2e, prov-dev, service, samples): Fix javadoc issues #622

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 14, 2019

Conversation

timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member

There are a number of javadoc issues that prevent successful GH-pages autogeneration. This PR fixes all outstanding issues

@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ else if (status == IotHubConnectionStatus.CONNECTED)
* Receives method calls from IotHub. Default protocol is to use
* use MQTT transport.
*
* @param args
* @param args The connection string and the selected protocol
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you want to mention about the exceptions here instead?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure

@@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ public void individualEnrollmentWithCustomAllocationPolicy() throws Exception
* The custom allocation policy has a webhook to an Azure function, and that function will always dictate to provision
* the device to the hub with the longest host name. This test verifies that an enrollment with a custom allocation policy
* pointing to that Azure function will always enroll to the hub with the longest name
* @param enrollmentType
* @param enrollmentType The type of the enrollment to test
* @throws Exception if an exception occurs during provisioning or while
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or while?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll finish the sentence, good catch

@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot Nov 14, 2019
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot Nov 14, 2019
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot Nov 14, 2019
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot Nov 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants