Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

task1212475-addtrack2 #10860

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Nov 3, 2020
Merged

task1212475-addtrack2 #10860

merged 42 commits into from
Nov 3, 2020

Conversation

JackTn
Copy link
Member

@JackTn JackTn commented Sep 21, 2020

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 21, 2020

[Staging] Swagger Validation Report

️✔️BreakingChange [Detail]
 There are no breaking changes. 
️✔️LintDiff [Detail]
 Validation passes for LintDiff. 
️✔️Avocado [Detail]
 Validation passes for Avocado. 
️✔️ModelValidation [Detail]
 Validation passes for ModelValidation. 
️✔️SemanticValidation [Detail]
 Validation passes for SemanticValidation. 
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 21, 2020

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 21, 2020

azure-sdk-for-java - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 21, 2020

azure-sdk-for-go - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 21, 2020

Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 21, 2020

azure-sdk-for-js - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 21, 2020

azure-sdk-for-python - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Sep 21, 2020

azure-sdk-for-net - Release

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@zhenglaizhang
Copy link
Contributor

@leni-msft can you double check the schema readme template file?
@ArcturusZhang can you help double check the readme template file?
@changlong-liu can you help double check the python readme template file?
@allenjzhang can you help review the csharp readme template file?
@qiaozha can you help review the typescript readme file?

we are updating the template files here and openapihub will use this template file to generate readme file for new services. so just want to make sure the templates are correct and up to date. thanks.

Copy link
Member

@changlong-liu changlong-liu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fine for python

Copy link
Member

@ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @JackTn and @zhenglaizhang I just left one question. If the answer to that is yes, I suppose the go part would be good enough for me.

documentation/samplefiles/readme.go.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@JackTn JackTn requested a review from ArcturusZhang October 19, 2020 09:30
Copy link
Member

@ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@zhenglaizhang
Copy link
Contributor

@YalinLi0312 can you help take a look at if csharp readme update is ok?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@JackTn JackTn requested a review from markcowl October 23, 2020 08:28
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@zhenglaizhang
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run unifiedPipeline

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@zhenglaizhang
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @markcowl, could you help review again and approve the PR to unblock the PR merging? thanks!

@akning-ms akning-ms merged commit 0486181 into Azure:master Nov 3, 2020
giromm2ms pushed a commit to giromm2ms/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2020
* Update for test

* Create readme.azureresourceschema.md

* Create readme.azureresourceschema.md

* Update readme.chsarp.md

* Update readme.typescript.md

* Update readme.ruby.md

* Update readme.go.md

* Update readme.python.md

* Update samplereadme.md

* Update readme.chsarp.md

* Update samplereadme.md

* Update readme.chsarp.md

* Update readme.python.md

* Update readme.go.md

* Update readme.ruby.md

* Update readme.typescript.md

* Update samplereadme.md

* Update readme.python.md

* Revert "Merge branch 'master' into patch-3"

This reverts commit a9b26ac, reversing
changes made to 36bc60c.

* Update readme.azureresourceschema.md

* Update samplereadme.md

* Update readme.go.md

* Update readme.go.md

* Update readme.go.md

* Update readme.azureresourceschema.md

* Update samplereadme.md

* Update samplereadme.md

* Update readme.python.md

* Update readme.azureresourceschema.md

* Update readme.go.md

* Update documentation/samplefiles/readme.go.md

Co-authored-by: Arcturus <ufo54153@gmail.com>

* Update readme.typescript.md

* Delete readme.ruby.md

* Update readme.go.md

* Update readme.typescript.md

add /sdk/

* Rename readme.chsarp.md to readme.csharp.md

* Update samplereadme.md

Co-authored-by: Phoenix He <tih@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Lei Ni <7233663+leni-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Arcturus <ufo54153@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants