-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Device Update for IoT Hub] Added Private Endpoint Connection API and model definitions #16085
Conversation
Hi, @darkoa-msft Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: common-types/resource-management/v3/types.json#L365 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: nameAvailable Location: common-types/resource-management/v3/types.json#L623 |
|
The API version:2020-03-01-preview having been in a preview state over one year , please move it to GA or retire. Location: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2020-03-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L6 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi, @darkoa-msft your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). |
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
We are in public preview for less than 6 months with single API version and limited number of customers. We seek an exception. |
Hi @darkoa-msft, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
...eupdate/resource-manager/Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2020-03-01-preview/deviceupdate.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Changes looks fine from ARM perspective. Please resolve other warnings/errors to continue. |
Hi @darkoa-msft, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
/azp run |
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 16085 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
...eupdate/resource-manager/Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2020-03-01-preview/deviceupdate.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
… model definitions (Azure#16085) * Added Private Endpoint Connection API and model definitions, fixed minor errors * Referenced common private link types * Reference list types do not have nextLink property * Fixed copy&paste description error * Trying to suppress an error * Change common types version to v3 * Suppression not working * Extended common type in order to add a required property
… model definitions (Azure#16085) * Added Private Endpoint Connection API and model definitions, fixed minor errors * Referenced common private link types * Reference list types do not have nextLink property * Fixed copy&paste description error * Trying to suppress an error * Change common types version to v3 * Suppression not working * Extended common type in order to add a required property
…nor errors
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.