Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ManagedInstanceDTCs APIs #18770
Add ManagedInstanceDTCs APIs #18770
Changes from 6 commits
7951e14
ddb7cfd
d126152
aba361a
c613fcb
8107b87
498f99d
6fb2c3f
ebfda31
2d18c66
1484207
673a8ac
4daf240
7fbd99d
a893475
c94a12c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not work, since you cannot patch everything in a resource like name and type cannot be patched. Generally teams include a subset of the resource definition with only the properties that can be patched.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The name cannot be changed, it is can only be "current" since this is a singleton object, and it is only used as a route in the request. The only properties that are actually getting updated are the ones in the body of the request. The dtcName is in the URL itself
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The ones in the body of the request, meaning the "ManagedInstanceDtcProperties" in this case? Think Suhas is suggesting to create a definition and include those that you'll update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, but everything which is listed under ManagedInstanceDtc -> ManagedInstanceDtcProperties can be patched. All the properties are mutable except for "dtcHostNameDnsSuffix" which is declared as read only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall it's just not a good pattern, as user can still pass them, but they are useless. It's a strong recommendation but will not block you on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Took a second look on this, if ManagedInstanceDtcProperties is all you needed for patch, why not just pass them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've passed those
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you planning to support both sync and async for 200 and 202? For async patch, the recommend pattern is to use 202 and location header. See: https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/async-api-reference.md#updating-using-patch #Closed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jamestao
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't swagger document the final Location response which is 200 OK?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are following https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/async-api-reference.md#202-accepted-and-location-headers
Specifically:
5.If the operation is complete, return the exact same response that would have been returned had the operation been executed synchronously.
Swagger/AutoRest needs some way of determining the structure of the final response, and that is done by providing the sync response format here.