-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Stable mgmt for Confidential Ledger #19069
Conversation
Hi, @musabbir Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.ConfidentialLedger/stable/2022-05-13/confidentialledger.json#L678 |
|
200/201 Responses of long running operations must have a schema definition for return type. OperationId: 'Ledger_Create', Response code: '201' Location: Microsoft.ConfidentialLedger/stable/2022-05-13/confidentialledger.json#L247 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.ConfidentialLedger/stable/2022-05-13/confidentialledger.json#L504 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️❌
ApiReadinessCheck: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
API Readiness check failed. Please make sure your service is deployed. |
"code: AuthorizationFailed, message: The client '0a32c980-8601-446c-843e-9411a8f586c7' with object id '0a32c980-8601-446c-843e-9411a8f586c7' does not have authorization to perform action 'Microsoft.ConfidentialLedger/operations/read' over scope '/providers/Microsoft.ConfidentialLedger' or the scope is invalid. If access was recently granted, please refresh your credentials." |
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.5)
- current:stable/2022-05-13/confidentialledger.json compared with base:preview/2021-05-13-preview/confidentialledger.json
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️
SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi @musabbir, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@msyyc can you take a look at the Python breaking change ? Thanks
@@ -69,11 +69,14 @@ This is not used by Autorest itself. | |||
```yaml $(swagger-to-sdk) | |||
swagger-to-sdk: | |||
- repo: azure-sdk-for-net | |||
- repo: azure-sdk-for-net-track2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ArcturusZhang Does .net SDK track2 use this way ?
- repo: azure-sdk-for-python-track2 | ||
- repo: azure-sdk-for-java | ||
- repo: azure-sdk-for-java-track2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@weidongxu-microsoft does jave track2 use this way ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Musabbir has updated it and track2 removed.
This is correct for Java.
specification/confidentialledger/resource-manager/readme.typescript.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/confidentialledger/resource-manager/readme.typescript.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
namespace: Microsoft.ConfidentialLedger | ||
output-folder: $(csharp-sdks-folder)/confidentialledger/management/Microsoft.ConfidentialLedger/GeneratedProtocol | ||
namespace: Azure.Management.ConfidentialLedger | ||
output-folder: $(csharp-sdks-folder)/confidentialledger/Azure.Management.ConfidentialLedger/GeneratedProtocol |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ArcturusZhang Does this change make sense for csharp ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated to Azure.ResourceManager.ConfidentialLedger based on this page.
https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/dotnet_introduction.html#dotnet-namespaces-approved-list
Please let me know if this is more appropriate
approved for python breaking change |
@fengzhou-msft could you please help about the details on azure-sdk-for-net-track2 pipelines? Some details are not looking correct |
Confidential Ledger only has a dotnet data plane track 2 package, therefore this PR has no impact on azure-sdk-for-net-track2. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for Java
@akning-ms Could you help merge this PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approve for Go SDK related configurations
Hi @musabbir, can you confirm what you did for this PR just move preview version 2021-5-13-preview? if any other change in swagger in new version, we may need ARM to sign off, and BTW, is there new version deployed to production? if no, when it will be deployed? |
There are no changes other than copying over the last approved swagger (2021-5-13) to a stable folder. This version is fully supported in production. |
We will update the ARM Manifest after this PR is merged. |
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
[✔️ ] Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
[✔️ ] Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.