example fix, use correct api preview version - (INVALID_REQUEST_PARA… #21833
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi, @ivaliyivanov Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Generated ApiView
|
|
Example fix - change to the correct api preview version |
This was referenced Dec 9, 2022
This was referenced Dec 9, 2022
wmengmsft
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2022
wmengmsft
merged commit 1d34791
into
machinelearningservices-Microsoft.MachineLearningServices-2022-12-01-preview
ArcturusZhang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2023
…1 preview (#21761) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.MachineLearningServices from version preview/2022-10-01-preview to version 2022-12-01-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * Add Dec API Registries Swagger (#21419) * add december registries swagger + examples * add status code 202 in examples * fix 202 examples * fixes * fixes * fix * add 202 back in for put/patch Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com> * remove location (#21430) Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com> * remove readonly flag on schedules property for CI (#21653) Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <naagarw@microsoft.com> * add missing workspace properties (#21725) * December preview updating mfe.json specs (#21510) * December preview updating mfe.json specs * MFE Dec 2022 Preview API - Adding logbase * MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix * MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix, add missing location * MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - typo fix * MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix api version in automljob example * MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error * MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error * Fix for 1006 - RemovedDefinition (RecurrenceTrigger,CronTrigger) (#21822) * fix ReadonlyPropertyChanged of MLC (#21814) Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com> * fixed custom-words conflict (#21829) * fix custom-words conflict merge (#21830) * example fix (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (#21832) Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local> * example fix, use correct api preview version - (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (#21833) Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local> * Revert breaking change for MLC swagger 2022-12-01-preview (#21885) Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com> * Revert Connection Category back to enum. (#21939) * revert provisioning state change (#21940) * remove body (#21978) Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com> * Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call (#22005) * Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call * fix examples for patch - remove body * fixed formatting * Ivalbert fix patch2 (#22006) * Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call * fix examples for patch - remove body * fixed formatting * fixed formatting * Updated custom words (#22262) * Fixed prettier errors (#22237) * fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (#22293) * fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (#22294) * Example fix - OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY - Missing required property: triggerType (#22317) --------- Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <23komal.yadav23@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <namanag16@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <naagarw@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: ZhidaLiu <zhili@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: libc16 <88697960+libc16@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…METER)
ARM API Information (Control Plane)
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.
NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.