Update iothub.json #22252

Usha-Rathnavel · 2023-01-19T19:41:07Z

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

What's the purpose of the update?
- new service onboarding
- new API version
- update existing version for new feature
- update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- Other, please clarify
When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

Change to data plane APIs

Adding new properties

All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version
  -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

Update details on fallback properties

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-01-19T19:41:11Z

Hi, @Usha-Rathnavel Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-01-19T19:41:11Z

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)]	new version	base version
iothub.json	2021-07-02(7cbfc42)	2021-07-02(main)

️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0)	new version	base version
package-2021-07-02	package-2021-07-02(7cbfc42)	package-2021-07-02(main)

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
`❌` OperationsApiResponseSchema	The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Devices/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L60
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L64
`❌` PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase	Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Devices/IotHubs/{resourceName}' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L76
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'resourceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L76
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L110
`❌` CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L119
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L175
`❌` PatchIdentityProperty	The patch operation body parameter schema should contains property 'identity'. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L215
`❌` PatchSkuProperty	The patch operation body parameter schema should contains property 'sku'. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L215
`❌` LroPatch202	The async patch operation should return 202. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L228
`❌` RequiredDefaultResponse	The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L228
`❌` DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation	An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L243
`❌` LroLocationHeader	A 202 response should include an Location response header. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L271
`❌` DeleteResponseBodyEmpty	The delete response body must be empty. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L279
`❌` MissingXmsErrorResponse	Response code 404 is defined without a x-ms-error-response. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L286
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L292
`❌` PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase	Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Devices/IotHubs' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L302
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L330
`❌` PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase	Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Devices/IotHubs' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L343
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L374
`❌` PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase	Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Devices/IotHubs/{resourceName}/IotHubStats' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L387
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'resourceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L387
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L421
`❌` PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase	Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Devices/IotHubs/{resourceName}/skus' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L431
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'resourceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L431
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L465
`❌` PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase	Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Devices/IotHubs/{resourceName}/eventHubEndpoints/{eventHubEndpointName}/ConsumerGroups' Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L478
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'resourceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L478
`❌` ResourceNameRestriction	The resource name parameter 'eventHubEndpointName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L478
`❌` DefaultErrorResponseSchema	the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content. Location: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L519

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

️️✔️~[Staging] SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️️✔️~[Staging] CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️❌ModelValidation: 9 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Rule	Message
`❌` LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L270:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_delete.json
`❌` INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER	api-version 2018-04-01 is not equal to swagger version Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L388:14 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_stats.json#L2:17
`❌` INVALID_FORMAT	Object didn't pass validation for format date-time-rfc1123: 2020-03-26T21:20:57Z Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L3534:42 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_routingendpointhealth.json#L15:46
`❌` INVALID_FORMAT	Object didn't pass validation for format date-time-rfc1123: 2020-03-26T21:20:57Z Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L3534:42 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_routingendpointhealth.json#L27:46
`❌` INVALID_FORMAT	Object didn't pass validation for format date-time-rfc1123: 2020-03-26T21:24:57Z Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L3539:32 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_routingendpointhealth.json#L16:36
`❌` INVALID_FORMAT	Object didn't pass validation for format date-time-rfc1123: 2020-03-26T21:24:57Z Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L3539:32 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_routingendpointhealth.json#L28:36
`❌` INVALID_FORMAT	Object didn't pass validation for format date-time-rfc1123: 2020-03-26T21:24:57Z Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L3529:31 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_routingendpointhealth.json#L26:35
`❌` LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L1716:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/IotHub_ManualFailover.json
`❌` LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER	Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided Url: Microsoft.Devices/stable/2021-07-02/iothub.json#L2004:22 ExampleUrl: stable/2021-07-02/examples/iothub_deleteprivateendpointconnection.json

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passed for PoliCheck.

️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for CadlValidation.

️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Summary.

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-01-19T19:41:12Z

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

Breaking Changes Tracking

❌azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/iothub/armiothub - 2.0.0-beta.1

+	Type of `EventHubConsumerGroupInfo.Properties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `map[string]any`
+	Type of `RoutingTwin.Tags` has been changed from `interface{}` to `any`
+	Type of `RoutingTwinProperties.Desired` has been changed from `interface{}` to `any`
+	Type of `RoutingTwinProperties.Reported` has been changed from `interface{}` to `any`

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b0f8d5. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.IotHub [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- Azure.ResourceManager.IotHub.1.1.0-alpha.20230128.1.nupkg
```
info	[Changelog]
```

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b0f8d5. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.3 -> 9.4.0
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.4.0>
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.4.0` to update!
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-iothub [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- azure_mgmt_iothub-2.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
- azure-mgmt-iothub-2.3.0.zip
```
info	[Changelog]
```

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b0f8d5. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-iothub [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b0f8d5. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/iothub/armiothub [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected

info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - Type of `EventHubConsumerGroupInfo.Properties` has been changed from `map[string]interface{}` to `map[string]any`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `RoutingTwin.Tags` has been changed from `interface{}` to `any`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `RoutingTwinProperties.Desired` has been changed from `interface{}` to `any`
info	[Changelog] - Type of `RoutingTwinProperties.Reported` has been changed from `interface{}` to `any`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - New value `RoutingSourceDigitalTwinChangeEvents`, `RoutingSourceMqttBrokerMessages` added to type alias `RoutingSource`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `EncryptionPropertiesDescription`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `KeyVaultKeyProperties`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `PropertiesDeviceStreams`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `RootCertificateProperties`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `RoutingCosmosDBSQLAPIProperties`
info	[Changelog] - New field `DeviceStreams` in struct `Properties`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Encryption` in struct `Properties`
info	[Changelog] - New field `RootCertificate` in struct `Properties`
info	[Changelog] - New field `CosmosDBSQLCollections` in struct `RoutingEndpoints`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 3 breaking change(s), 14 additive change(s).

️❌ azure-sdk-for-js failed [Detail]

❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b0f8d5. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Error:
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] An error occurred while run build for readme file: "specification/iothub/resource-manager/readme.md":
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Err: Error: Command failed: rush build -t @azure/arm-iothub
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Stderr: "null"
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Stdout: "null"
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] ErrorStack: "Error: Command failed: rush build -t @azure/arm-iothub
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at checkExecSyncError (node:child_process:861:11)
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at Object.execSync (node:child_process:932:15)
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/hostedtoolcache/node/16.19.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/dist/hlc/generateMgmt.js:87:33)
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at fulfilled (/opt/hostedtoolcache/node/16.19.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/node_modules/tslib/tslib.js:112:62)
cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] [ERROR]     at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)"

❌@azure/arm-iothub [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

info	[Changelog]
error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b0f8d5. Schema Automation 14.0.0

command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
warn	No file changes detected after generation

️✔️iothub [View full logs]

️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b0f8d5. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json

❌Az.iothub [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2023-01-19T19:41:13Z

Generated ApiView

Language	Package Name	ApiView Link
Go	sdk/resourcemanager/iothub/armiothub	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
Java	azure-resourcemanager-iothub	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
.Net	Azure.ResourceManager.IotHub	Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

kgremban · 2023-01-26T19:51:58Z

@rkmanda @lirenhe Can you let us know what the process is for getting this PR reviewed and merged? Thanks

lirenhe · 2023-01-28T01:32:19Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2023-01-28T01:32:28Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

openapi-workflow-bot · 2023-01-28T01:39:28Z

Hi @Usha-Rathnavel, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

Task	How to fix	Priority
Avocado	Fix-Avocado	High
Semantic validation	Fix-SemanticValidation-Error	High
Model validation	Fix-ModelValidation-Error	High
LintDiff	Fix-LintDiff	high

If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

lirenhe · 2023-01-28T03:16:34Z

The model validation errors are not related to this PR.

Update iothub.json

7cbfc42

Update details on fallback properties

Usha-Rathnavel requested a review from rkmanda as a code owner January 19, 2023 19:41

openapi-assignment-bot bot assigned lirenhe Jan 19, 2023

ghost added the IoTHub label Jan 19, 2023

lirenhe approved these changes Jan 28, 2023

View reviewed changes

azure-sdk mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2023

[AutoPR sdk/resourcemanager/iothub/armiothub] Update iothub.json azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-go#4124

Closed

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the CI-BreakingChange-Go label Jan 28, 2023

AzureRestAPISpecReview added CI-FixRequiredOnFailure resource-manager labels Jan 28, 2023

lirenhe added the Approved-ModelValidation label Jan 28, 2023

lirenhe merged commit 0b0f8d5 into Azure:main Jan 28, 2023

This was referenced Jan 28, 2023

[ReleasePR @azure/arm-iothub] Update readme.python.md Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#22083

Closed

[ReleasePR Az.iothub] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Devices to add version preview/2022-11-15-preview Azure/azure-powershell#18389

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update iothub.json #22252

Update iothub.json #22252

Usha-Rathnavel commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited by openapi-workflow-bot bot

Loading

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Jan 19, 2023

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

kgremban commented Jan 26, 2023

lirenhe commented Jan 28, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Jan 28, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Jan 28, 2023

lirenhe commented Jan 28, 2023

Update iothub.json #22252

Update iothub.json #22252

Conversation

Usha-Rathnavel commented Jan 19, 2023 • edited by openapi-workflow-bot bot Loading

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Changelog

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

ARM API Review Checklist

Breaking Change Review Checklist

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Jan 19, 2023

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 • edited Loading

Swagger Validation Report

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 • edited Loading

Swagger Generation Artifacts

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 • edited Loading

Generated ApiView

kgremban commented Jan 26, 2023

lirenhe commented Jan 28, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented Jan 28, 2023

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Jan 28, 2023

lirenhe commented Jan 28, 2023

Usha-Rathnavel commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited by openapi-workflow-bot bot

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading