Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update python.md for multiapi packages #22573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

msyyc
Copy link
Member

@msyyc msyyc commented Feb 13, 2023

No description provided.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi @msyyc, this service has enabled Service API Toolset. All spec updates MUST be initiated from service ADO project repo, so that to guarantee it to be the source of truth. @FumingZhang , please review this pull request if it's intentional or reject it if it's not expected. Normally, all the specification or example changes should start with PR created in ADO.

  • You can refer to Service API Toolset Introduction for details.
  • Please contact service focal @FumingZhang contacts or Service API Toolset Support Channel if need further help.
  • @ghost ghost added the Insights label Feb 13, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ShiftLeftViolation DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval labels Feb 13, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️🔄CredScan inProgress [Detail]
    ️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
    ️🔄Avocado inProgress [Detail]
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ServiceAPIReadinessTest.
    ️❌SwaggerAPIView: 0 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ Failed to generate swagger APIView. The readme file format is invalid and the tag is not defined. Use the provided readme template for guidance readme template. For more details, please check the detail log. "How to fix":"Check the readme file and make sure the readme file format is valid and the tag is defined. Use the provided readme template"
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️🔄PoliCheck inProgress [Detail]
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️⌛PR Summary pending [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ghost ghost added the Service Bus label Feb 13, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️🔄 azure-sdk-for-python-track2 inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-go failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-resource-manager-schemas failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ghost ghost added the Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) label Feb 13, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 13, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Java azure-resourcemanager-appconfiguration https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/b0be5206633d46e98967883235758a42
    Java azure-resourcemanager-applicationinsights https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/3c34bbaf32cc4677ad3bd9b37f0b1e95
    Java azure-resourcemanager-appservice-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/4bc56352ce254cfebe8f146b63f1b19c
    Java azure-resourcemanager-authorization-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/512ded4200dd4e209131414751729eb0
    Java azure-resourcemanager-compute-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/9fe084f3163143d29b969b4892aa3c5e
    Java azure-resourcemanager-containerservice-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/82a70978f48f4c4e881e8383cb0227af
    Java azure-resourcemanager-digitaltwins https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/27af57a3363b4d588be61fe54a6463e5
    Java azure-resourcemanager-eventhubs-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/d60484094ce641608bf31d1567390aff
    Java azure-resourcemanager-extendedlocation https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/e4bad1b34e49430bbd6fe1a00a0b43e9
    Java azure-resourcemanager-iothub https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/88c9486743d847fcac41cbb84d932862
    Java azure-resourcemanager-keyvault-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/2938d9d816c44adb8cb9afe828969cfd
    Java azure-resourcemanager-monitor-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/93611d872eb54cca821634ed4bcac2fa
    Java azure-resourcemanager-msi-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/76989364b76f471ba5319a52ed515891
    Java azure-resourcemanager-network-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/2af3713c42c8446b99fe5624c5c5395e
    Java azure-resourcemanager-resourcehealth https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/580040f692934e329c90d32e25fecd73
    Java azure-resourcemanager-resources-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/b28abb5b0c86436ca59e0ba646f65af7
    Java azure-resourcemanager-security https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/fc07d3b7c6b14bcfaf0f889547d9b28f
    Java azure-resourcemanager-servicebus-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/1e231fd6cf1745878b29eacf56286ba4
    Java azure-resourcemanager-solutions https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/783faf951f4f4da4971a0ef892779964
    Java azure-resourcemanager-storage-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/bb751b3d34944c3985d78efa7f4063c8
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.ApplicationInsights There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Authorization https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/60fab5bb0f7d4fb194eeea2cd6184ff9
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Compute https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/915f580fb07c4150b08509cfceeb6747
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerService There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.EventHubs There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.ExtendedLocations https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/8182e94d438e466c95e592ba6ed9485b
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.IotHub https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/e69c38f2b8bd4dc797e8fe5418d80c4a
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.KeyVault There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.ManagedServiceIdentities There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Network There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Resources There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.ServiceBus There is no API change compared with the previous version
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Storage There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-appconfiguration https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/5d36054c8a6d4e86b9352262670211f1
    JavaScript @azure/arm-appinsights https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/927ee65c7c874a5198ee73643f2a36a2
    JavaScript @azure/arm-appservice https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/1e8e80d40b4741619baa8ef9a635f64c
    JavaScript @azure/arm-authorization https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/3c6f2e8c3f4643eab0c47009a02ec1bd
    JavaScript @azure/arm-changes https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/5434f0402162490e98fee9ce5c920392
    JavaScript @azure/arm-compute There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-containerservice https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/c1858383912e41ecac002fd1ad10f80b
    JavaScript @azure/arm-digitaltwins There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-eventhub https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/53f06548a21d446bb800a2147e9d029d
    JavaScript @azure/arm-extendedlocation There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-features There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-iothub There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-keyvault https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/b769deb33940471b839bd85a138d862a
    JavaScript @azure/arm-links https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/7e1a1cdd02614889a5e2b590a424f113
    JavaScript @azure/arm-locks https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/a24bc2552d7841538937964f1f2f4922
    JavaScript @azure/arm-managedapplications There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-monitor https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/258e2d669a334f1dbcea95cfc3c78307
    JavaScript @azure/arm-msi There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-network https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/7386a7afc6814014871c3a0dac7998e4
    JavaScript @azure/arm-policy https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/883393b80b224ec1874f844f11ff396f
    JavaScript @azure/arm-resourcehealth https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/131dd579e0134d6fb01b50622424f08b
    JavaScript @azure/arm-resources-subscriptions https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/3a2e5c6f4ff1449aa33311f69242f66e
    JavaScript @azure/arm-resources https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/bdd2aba1330e4a96b1e6f62ed3128e40
    JavaScript @azure/arm-security https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/bf590f44e6254adf884f16c94e012555
    JavaScript @azure/arm-servicebus There is no API change compared with the previous version
    JavaScript @azure/arm-storage https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/166f959adb1a462a8187689effdd8244
    JavaScript @azure/arm-templatespecs https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/c557fbe3713d4336a21b1f59988d94e4

    @ghost ghost added the Web Apps label Feb 13, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @msyyc Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    This was referenced Feb 13, 2023
    aviyerMSFT pushed a commit to aviyerMSFT/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Authorization CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript Compute Container Service DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval Event Hubs Insights IoTHub KeyVault Monitor Monitor, Monitor Ingestion, Monitor Query Network Service Bus ShiftLeftViolation Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) Web Apps
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants