-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove webhook activity #5060
Remove webhook activity #5060
Conversation
If you're a MSFT employee, click this link |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-rubyNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Removing webhook activity which was added last week, as it is still pending some testing and we want to delay the release till the next cycle @praries880 |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-javaThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-jsThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
@praries880 These changes were made too soon, and we need to remove them for our current SDK release. Can you please merge them as soon as you can? |
To clarify, this a new activities that hasn't been released yet. |
@arsunda Has the .net SDK or (any other SDK) been released with these properties in it? |
@arsunda has the .NEt SDK been released already? |
@salameer No, these are brand new. We don't want them in the release that we are about to do, hence want them removed from swagger. We will add them for our next release. |
Please note that by sending this Pull request to us you are greenlighting releases of all the SDKs and docs on this swagger and rolling back is not easy or even possible. especially if your adding to the Stable folder ARM please review this |
If your service is not live you shouldn't publish their spec |
It was added by mistake. The feature is still in testing stage. |
@praries880, @salameer Please merge this as soon as you can as this is blocking our SDK release. |
@praries880 @salameer This PR was checked in last week ( #5007 ) . SDK release has not gone out yet, it is scheduled to go out next week. We are still pending some testing results so we do not want release it yet. We want to revert this change so that it does not go into the current release cycle. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given the conversation context, signing off for ARM
@arsunda |
* webhook changes * remove timeout as required * combine and update web auth definitions * revert auth type enum change * removing webhook
Latest improvements:
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
ARM API Review Checklist
Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.
Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.