Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Servicebus : NetworkruleSet #5361

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 21, 2019
Merged

Servicebus : NetworkruleSet #5361

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 21, 2019

Conversation

v-Ajnava
Copy link
Member

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • X ] I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 11, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3633

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 11, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#1697

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

adxsdknet added a commit to adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2019
REST Spec PR 'Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#5361'
REST Spec PR Author 'v-Ajnava'
REST Spec PR Last commit
@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 11, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#5012

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 11, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#2175

@jhendrixMSFT jhendrixMSFT added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Mar 11, 2019
@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 11, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#4353

@dsgouda
Copy link
Contributor

dsgouda commented Mar 11, 2019

@jhendrixMSFT I'll take over this one.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Mar 12, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#3166

adxsdknet added a commit to adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2019
REST Spec PR 'Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#5361'
REST Spec PR Author 'v-Ajnava'
REST Spec PR Last commit
@Azure Azure deleted a comment from adxsdknet Mar 14, 2019
@dsgouda
Copy link
Contributor

dsgouda commented Mar 14, 2019

startbuild

},
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/Resource"
Copy link
Contributor

@sanjaiganesh sanjaiganesh Mar 14, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resource [](start = 33, length = 8)

Is this a proxy or tracked resource ? #Resolved

Copy link
Member Author

@v-Ajnava v-Ajnava Mar 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

its a proxy resource. #Resolved

"description": "Value that indicates whether to ignore missing VNet Service Endpoint"
}
},
"description": "The response from the List namespace operation."
Copy link
Contributor

@sanjaiganesh sanjaiganesh Mar 14, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The response from the List namespace operation [](start = 22, length = 46)

update ? #Resolved

Copy link
Member Author

@v-Ajnava v-Ajnava Mar 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated description. #Resolved

"default": "Allow"
}
},
"description": "The response from the List namespace operation."
Copy link
Contributor

@sanjaiganesh sanjaiganesh Mar 14, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The response from the List namespace operation." [](start = 22, length = 48)

update ? #Resolved

Copy link
Member Author

@v-Ajnava v-Ajnava Mar 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated description. #Resolved

@@ -4408,6 +4499,93 @@
}
},
"description": "The result of the List migrationConfigurations operation."
},
"Subnet": {
Copy link
Contributor

@sanjaiganesh sanjaiganesh Mar 14, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

" [](start = 4, length = 1)

"required" properties not specified for the new types #Resolved

Copy link
Member Author

@v-Ajnava v-Ajnava Mar 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added required property #Resolved

"parameters": {
"properties": {
"defaultAction": "Deny",
"virtualNetworkRules": [
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

virtualNetworkRules [](start = 9, length = 19)

This is taking arrays.. PUT request MUST replace server-side representation of the resource.. should NOT merge.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can consider PATCH support if support for partial updates (additions) are desired.


In reply to: 265808072 [](ancestors = 265808072)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, its replaces the resource. we are considering the PATCH support in future releases.

}
],
"responses": {
"200": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

200 [](start = 11, length = 3)

Does this complete synchronously ? just double checking.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes.

@sanjaiganesh
Copy link
Contributor

sanjaiganesh commented Mar 14, 2019

        "description": "Eventhub error response describing why the operation failed.",

ServiceBus ? #Resolved


Refers to: specification/servicebus/resource-manager/Microsoft.ServiceBus/stable/2017-04-01/servicebus.json:2986 in 530b1bf. [](commit_id = 530b1bf, deletion_comment = False)

@sanjaiganesh sanjaiganesh added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Mar 14, 2019
@sanjaiganesh sanjaiganesh added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Mar 15, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@dsgouda dsgouda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants