Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Capacity to add version preview/2019-04-01 #6995

Merged

Conversation

Only2125
Copy link
Contributor

@Only2125 Only2125 commented Aug 19, 2019

If you are a MSFT employee you can view your work branch via this link.

Contribution checklist:

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Aug 19, 2019

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 19, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5610

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Aug 19, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#6861

}
],
"tags": [
"Reservation, AvailableScopes"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note sure if these are supposed to be separate tags

Suggested change
"Reservation, AvailableScopes"
"Reservation", "AvailableScopes"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure, but I checked the format of our previous swagger. Same as what I put.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me know if I need to change this format.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, one of the SDK/ARM folks would need to make that call. I just noticed that it looked a little odd

@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

Signing off from ARM side (new POST /availableScopes API).

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Aug 23, 2019
@yaohaizh yaohaizh merged commit 00e2f7f into Azure:master Aug 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants