Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] billing readme config(wave4) #18550

Conversation

openapi-sdkautomation[bot]
Copy link

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jan 12, 2021

Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#14268
ReCreate this PR

curl -L "https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/14268/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-billing/azure-resourcemanager-billing-1.0.0-beta.2.jar" -o azure-resourcemanager-billing-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-billing -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-billing-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true

Added move validation enum values & fix S360 linting issues (#12275)

* Added new move product validation error codes

* Added integer formats to fix S360 swagger lint validation

* Fixed ModelValidation errors for v2018-11-01-preview

Co-authored-by: Braden Watkins <brwatkin@microsoft.com>
@ghost ghost added the customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. label Jan 12, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 12, 2021

Thank you for your contribution openapi-sdkautomation[bot]! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Added move validation enum values & fix S360 linting issues [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Update readme.md swagger-to-sdk section config Mar 30, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Update readme.md swagger-to-sdk section config [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Adding swagger to Microsoft.Billing 2020-05-01 for list billing account and billing profile reservations Apr 2, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Adding swagger to Microsoft.Billing 2020-05-01 for list billing account and billing profile reservations [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] FixS360 | Microsoft.Billing Apr 7, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] FixS360 | Microsoft.Billing [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] typo: implmentation -> implementation Apr 9, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] typo: implmentation -> implementation [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Task 9639284: Swagger changes for new UK agreement templates Apr 14, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Task 9639284: Swagger changes for new UK agreement templates [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Revert "Task 9639284: Swagger changes for new UK agreement templates" Apr 15, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Revert "Task 9639284: Swagger changes for new UK agreement templates" [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Adding new preview API for promotions Apr 15, 2021
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] Adding new preview API for promotions [ReleasePR azure-resourcemanager-billing] billing readme config(wave4) May 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants