Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Communication - Chat] Deploy test resources failing in nightly runs #23536

Closed
v-jiaodi opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

[Communication - Chat] Deploy test resources failing in nightly runs #23536

v-jiaodi opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@LuChen-Microsoft
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Communication - Chat test-reliability Issue that causes tests to be unreliable

Comments

@v-jiaodi
Copy link
Member

Communication - Chat nightly test runs are failing with:

Error message:
Failed to update the resource

Stack trace:
Status Message: Failed to update the resource (Code:InternalError)
CorrelationId: 248f252d-91ca-4d15-a1f9-fb10a8d5da13"
At D:\a_work\1\s\eng\common\TestResources\New-TestResources.ps1:725 char:23
$deployment = Retry {
~~~~~~~
CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [Write-Error], MethodInvocationException
FullyQualifiedErrorId : ActionPreferenceStopException,Retry

For more details check here:
@ghost ghost added the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Oct 18, 2022
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Label prediction was below confidence level 0.6 for Model:ServiceLabels: 'Communication:0.39902252,ARM:0.09725183,Container Registry:0.0826118'

@ghost ghost removed the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Oct 18, 2022
@v-xuto v-xuto added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. test-reliability Issue that causes tests to be unreliable labels Oct 18, 2022
@ghost ghost removed the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Oct 18, 2022
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Label prediction was below confidence level 0.6 for Model:ServiceLabels: 'Communication:0.39902252,ARM:0.09725183,Container Registry:0.0826118'

azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-js that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2023
@htippanaboya @tracyMicro
@tejasshah7 @sraghavan-msft @navba-MSFT @NiviShenker @sindhualuguvelli1 @phrazfipho @nikhilpadhye1 @JainRah @karanbazaz @yeliMSFT @pr-work @nanditaashok-ms @anvrao1 @baoqihuang0326
CodeGen from PR 23652 in Azure/azure-rest-api-specs
a45cbe6 
Release of microsoft.network api version: 2022 11 01 (Azure#23652)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-09-01 to version 2022-11-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example (Azure#23144)

* remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example

* remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example2

* remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example

* remove duplicates

* add private link configuration to see if it will fix validation error

* remove privateLinkConfig related

* revert changes to see if still get validation error

* update back to original changes

* add response resource id to fix modelValidation error

* add connection resource

* Selector in Exclusions should not be required as Operator EqualsAny does not need a Selector (Azure#23184)

* Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes (Azure#23021)

* Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes

* Fixing lint errors

* Updated rate limit feature examples

* Fix for applicationGatewayIpConfigurations property and make the priority parameter as required for NSG (Azure#23210)

* Fix for applicationGatewayIpConfigurations property

This swagger definition is defining property applicationGatewayIpConfigurations,

```
"applicationGatewayIpConfigurations": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "$ref": "./applicationGateway.json#/definitions/ApplicationGatewayIPConfiguration"
          },
          "description": "Application gateway IP configurations of virtual network resource."
        }
```
but actual rest api returned applicationGatewayIPConfigurations, the P is upper case while in swagger it is lower case.
```
{
  "name": "subnet-agw",
  "id": "/subscriptions/<sub-id>/resourceGroups/<rg-name>/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/<vnet-name>/subnets/subnet-agw",
  "properties": {
      "applicationGatewayIPConfigurations": [
          {
              "id": "/subscriptions/<sub-id>/resourceGroups/<rg-name>/providers/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/<agw-name>/gatewayIPConfigurations/appGatewayIpConfig"
          }
      ]
  },
  "type": "Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/subnets"
}
```

* Making priority property required

[This is the API invoked](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/virtualnetwork/network-security-groups/create-or-update?tabs=HTTP#code-try-0).

For the NSG security rules without priorities, seems like the priority parameter is required. Azure portal works as expected. I don't think that's allowed but according to the schema it is because the priority property is not marked as required. I tried to create a NSG security rule without the priorities and it failed with below.

Request Body:

```
{
  "properties": {
    "securityRules": [
      {
        "name": "rule1",
        "properties": {
          "protocol": "*",
          "sourceAddressPrefix": "*",
          "destinationAddressPrefix": "*",
          "access": "Allow",
          "destinationPortRange": "80",
          "sourcePortRange": "*",
          "direction": "Inbound"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "location": "eastus"
}
```
Response received:

```
{
  "error": {
    "code": "SecurityRuleInvalidPriority",
    "message": "Security rule has invalid Priority. Value provided: 0 Allowed range 100-4096.",
    "details": []
  }
}
```
This PR will make the priority parameter as required.

* Update NetworkSecurityGroupDelete.json

* Update NetworkSecurityGroupRuleDelete.json

* Update NetworkSecurityGroupDelete.json

* Undo previous change of making fields optional within Exclusion (Azure#23325)

* Nivishenker/http headers to insert (Azure#23295)

* new app rule property - http header to insert

* prettier

* add to 22-11-01

* removed changes from 22-09-01

* fixed example

* delete RCG example

* fix delete examples

* added a Location header

* prettier fix

* Application Gateway WAF Log scrubbing swagger changes (Azure#23022)

* Log scrubbing API changes

* Update examples

* Addressing comments

* Fix

* Update property in load balancer for Connection Draining Phase 1 (Azure#23082)

* Update property in load balancer for Coneection Draining Phase 1

* Fix model validation

* Azure Firewall Packet Capture API. Cancelled PR from 2022-09-01 and created for 2022-11-01 (Azure#23114)

* moving packet-capture api to 2022-11-01 release from 2022-09-01

* fixing the LRO response header error for model validation

* Changes for Additional nic and corrections (Azure#23522)

* Changes for Additional nic and corrections

* Fixes for tool reported issues

* Fix for SpellCheck, ModelValidation

* Defining Location in NetworkVirtualApplianceDelete for async

* Minor fix

* Minor fix

* Minor fix

* PrettierCheck fixed

* Fixing VirtualApplianceAdditionalNicProperties

* ModelValidation fixed

* Correcting the location header string

* Correcting location header

* Prettied Check Fix

* Fix

* Fix

* Add inspection limit changes (Azure#23536)

* Fixed headers for examples (Azure#23554)

* Fix response of API: List of advertised/learned BGP routes (Azure#23555)

* fix response type

* fix format

* fix example, add x-ms-identifiers

* AuxiliarySku on Nic (Azure#23552)

* Adding auxiliary sku property on nic

* Adding AcceleratedConnections to AuxMode

* modifying the auxSku values

* Removing accidental change

---------

Co-authored-by: Prachi Pravin Bhavsar <prbhavsar@microsoft.com>

* migrated latest pr from incorrect branch (Azure#23589)

* Changes for NVA connection (Azure#23173)

* Changes for NVA connection

* Changes to address validation failures

* Fix some ModelValidation errors

* Fix some ModelValidation errors

* Fix some ModelValidation errors

* Fix some ModelValidation errors

* Fix some ModelValidation errors

* Addressing some review comments

* Addressing some review comments

* Addressing some review comments

* Addressing some review comments

* Addressing some review comments

* Fix camel case for property name

* Fixing resourceUri to Camel case in example files

* Fix SDK duplication error

* Fix one LintDiff error

* try fix lintdiff errors

* fix lro erro in lintdiff

* fix model validation error

* Bastion S360 for 2022-11 version (Azure#23595)

* Release microsoft.network 2022 11 01 (Azure#23564)

* Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes

* Fixing lint errors

* Updated rate limit feature examples

* rateLimitDuration and rateLimitThreshold are not mandatory. There are only mandatory if ruleType is RateLimitRule. This validation will be done in NRP.

* Fix attempt 2. Removed minimum constraint from rateLimitThreshold. Validation will be done in NRP

* Remove the minimum number for the option field requestBodyInspectLimitInKB (Azure#23663)

* Remove minimum value for optional field requestBodyInspectLimitInKB

* Remove exlcusiveMinimum

---------

Co-authored-by: htippanaboya <102244326+htippanaboya@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: tracyMicro <127259533+tracyMicro@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: tejasshah7 <49326906+tejasshah7@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: sraghavan-msft <98118843+sraghavan-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: navba-MSFT <57353862+navba-MSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: NiviShenker <99583088+NiviShenker@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sindhu Aluguvelli <sindhureddy216@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: phrazfipho <121897152+phrazfipho@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: nikhilpadhye1 <68977752+nikhilpadhye1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JainRah <108508612+JainRah@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: karanbazaz <karan.bazaz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: yeliMSFT <95386492+yeliMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pracsb <78512712+pr-work@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Prachi Pravin Bhavsar <prbhavsar@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: nanditaashok-ms <122581061+nanditaashok-ms@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: anvrao1 <109107918+anvrao1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: baoqihuang0326 <119557638+baoqihuang0326@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@LuChen-Microsoft LuChen-Microsoft

Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Communication - Chat test-reliability Issue that causes tests to be unreliable
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@LuChen-Microsoft @azure-sdk @v-xuto @v-jiaodi