Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[service-bus] Reliability improvements and testing updates #15098
[service-bus] Reliability improvements and testing updates #15098
Changes from 18 commits
eef34bf
3142060
bb8cebb
bc9ebdd
f2612a2
23dcc40
002dccd
95c6912
393fcc6
4f8efbf
c61ef51
c592e36
1bdad81
01a175a
158f6a3
4878a86
c9a80fc
6b5bea5
1ceac01
4961578
d5699d2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess draining is technically done?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this comment was me thinking "aloud".
I think we could consider it a candidate to throw on but it seemed less important. The spot where it's used would basically do nothing useful if the receiver was invalid anyways but it'd be nice to go through here again. I think we have some future work to add in a "drain with timeout" for another bug in our tests, so perhaps we could lump in the investigation there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would consider this a no-op and not an error scenario. The need for drain comes in order to avoid receiving messages when we are not ready for them. Absence of the receiver achieves that goal. So, I would combine the two checks here