-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[event-hubs] doc improvements #9342
Changes from all commits
97bc3df
dc3b42f
de89e77
5b98f70
c11aa5f
2d5f8a8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ We've also merged the functionality from `EventProcessorHost` from the `@azure/e | |
`EventHubConsumerClient` in the `@azure/event-hubs` package, allowing `EventHubConsumerClient` to be the single | ||
point of entry for receiving of any type (from single partition, all partitions, or with load balancing and checkpointing features) within Event Hubs. | ||
|
||
Important note on checkpoints: `EventHubConsumerClient` does not support legacy checkpoint data. | ||
In order to meet the goals set for unifying checkpoint data across languages for the new set of Event Hubs libraries and to make | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This doesnt tell me why the unification was needed across languages. How about this:
|
||
improvements to the algorithm used for managing partition ownership, breaking changes were necessary. | ||
|
||
### Granular control over retries | ||
|
||
Retry logic and tuning has been externalized, allowing for better configuration | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps clarify what legacy means here?