Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

AttributeException in azure/core/pipeline/transport/_requests_basic.py #11462

Closed
xiangyan99 opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

AttributeException in azure/core/pipeline/transport/_requests_basic.py #11462

xiangyan99 opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@xiangyan99
Labels
Azure.Core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.

Comments

@xiangyan99
Copy link
Member

line 140 in _requests_basic.py assumes that Pipeline.run() returns a RequestsTransportResponse, while it actually returns PipelineResponse. This throws an AttributeException and disables normal handling of retries.
@xiangyan99 xiangyan99 added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Azure.Core labels May 15, 2020
@xiangyan99 xiangyan99 self-assigned this May 15, 2020
@xiangyan99 xiangyan99 mentioned this issue May 15, 2020
Merged
@xiangyan99
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed in #11463

openapi-sdkautomation bot pushed a commit to AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2020
CodeGen from PR 11462 in Azure/azure-rest-api-specs
c8eb3ad 
Fix Swagger Linting issues reported (Azure#11462)

* Fixing linting issues according to report (task 8554751)

* Adding a default response to operations
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@xiangyan99 xiangyan99

Labels
Azure.Core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@xiangyan99