Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove non-MSFT code owners #38883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2024
Merged

Remove non-MSFT code owners #38883

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

mccoyp
Copy link
Member

@mccoyp mccoyp commented Dec 14, 2024

Description

This removes code owner designations for two users who no longer appear to be linked to employees and can't be contacted via Teams (anupsms and jaredmoo).

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

@mccoyp mccoyp enabled auto-merge (squash) December 14, 2024 01:48
@mccoyp mccoyp merged commit 5b7f412 into main Dec 14, 2024
30 checks passed
@mccoyp mccoyp deleted the code-owner-removals branch December 14, 2024 01:58
nick863 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
* Remove non-MSFT code owners (#38883)

* Modify async

* Replace literal name of model with environmental variable

* Regenerate readme

* Make model compatible witj python 3.8 version

* Remove non-needed exceptions from the pyproject.toml

---------

Co-authored-by: McCoy Patiño <39780829+mccoyp@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants