Skip to content

[Storage] [WIP] list_blobs for ContainerClient #2468

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

vincenttran-msft
Copy link
Member

@vincenttran-msft vincenttran-msft commented Apr 9, 2025

Going to take some time to fix my dev environment so that I can probably use WSL and debugger tools, but this seems to be unexpectedly None?

Evaluating the HTTP Response in Fiddler shows that enumerated results are in fact there, but possibly some failure in deserialization to fill the fields?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) label Apr 9, 2025
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

API change check

APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews.

azure_storage_blob

@heaths
Copy link
Member

heaths commented Apr 10, 2025

Where exactly? It's possible we have some corner-case bugs in the pager.

@vincenttran-msft
Copy link
Member Author

Where exactly? It's possible we have some corner-case bugs in the pager.

I did a little bit more digging and I see that pageable operations in Storage not exactly fully functioning yet, https://github.com/Azure/typespec-rust/pull/354 introduces pageable to 1 operation (list_containers). Will leave a follow-up on the issue tracking this effort: https://github.com/Azure/typespec-rust/issues/60

@vincenttran-msft
Copy link
Member Author

Closing as duplicate and stale.

@vincenttran-msft vincenttran-msft deleted the vincenttran/first_pageable_ops branch May 2, 2025 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants