feat(new): Automation Account Runbook

[Gordonby]

Description

This contribution Closes #199

This module does use experimental features: userDefinedTypes

Adding a new module

• A proposal has been submitted and approved.
• I have included "Closes #{module_proposal_issue_number}" in the PR description.
• I have run brm validate locally to verify the module files.
• I have run deployment tests locally to ensure the module is deployable.

[Gordonby]

I've added UserDefinedTypes to this bicep module @alex-frankel - which really helps with the flexibility/maturity of the use case.
However we should hold off on this PR progressing until after the next bicep release.

[alex-frankel]

I don't think we should use user-defined types in a public modules until the feature is enabled by default. Otherwise, this module will only work if the preview flag is enabled. Thoughts?

Of course, it's great that you are trying the feature out and glad it is improving usability :)

[Gordonby]

I don't think we should use user-defined types in a public modules until the feature is enabled by default. Otherwise, this module will only work if the preview flag is enabled. Thoughts?

Agreed, public modules should be easy to adopt 👍

[Gordonby]

Made changes for compatibility to 0.17.1

[Gordonby]

Probably need to keep this one on hold until #372 is complete.
If merged, would be used in AKS Construction. Azure/AKS-Construction#406

[Gordonby]

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

[Gordonby]

@dciborow - As we're taking module that use Custom Types now (eg. The CosmosDb one). I would consider this module ready for review/merge.

[Gordonby]

@dciborow Have you had a chance to review?

[ChrisSidebotham]

Closing as stale