Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fixes issue in avm/res/container-instance/container-group when container memory is set to less than 1 GB. #3752

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anderseide
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Changed memoryInGB prop in type containerType from int to string
  • Updated tests to use string instead of int
  • Added test that uses memoryInGB value less than 1
    • Updated documentation to no longer recommend using json('0.5') when using value less than 1

Closes #3655

Pipeline Reference

Pipeline
avm.res.container-instance.container-group

Type of Change

  • Update to CI Environment or utilities (Non-module affecting changes)
  • Azure Verified Module updates:
    • Bugfix containing backwards-compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in version.json:
      • Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes #{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
      • The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an issue to report it yet.
    • Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have bumped the MINOR version in version.json.
    • Breaking changes and I have bumped the MINOR version in version.json.
    • Update to documentation

Checklist

  • I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
  • I have run Set-AVMModule locally to generate the supporting module files.
  • My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without any errors or warnings

@anderseide anderseide requested review from a team as code owners November 8, 2024 07:21
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue labels Nov 8, 2024
@avm-team-linter avm-team-linter bot added the Needs: Module Owner 📣 This module needs an owner to develop or maintain it label Nov 8, 2024
@anderseide anderseide changed the title fix: Fixes issue in 'avm/res/container-instance/container-group' when container memory is set to less than 1 GB. fix: Fixes issue in avm/res/container-instance/container-group when container memory is set to less than 1 GB. Nov 8, 2024
@description('Optional. The memory request in GB of this container instance. To specify a decimal value, use the json() function.')
memoryInGB: int?
@description('Optional. The memory request in GB of this container instance.')
memoryInGB: string?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The resource documentation says

memoryInGB

The memory limit in GB of this container instance. To specify a decimal value, use the json() function.

int or json decimal

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/templates/microsoft.containerinstance/containergroups?pivots=deployment-language-bicep#resourcelimits

I'm not sure whether this might lead to misunderstandings?

might be good to use type any and add the description again?

@eriqua, @AlexanderSehr what do you think?

@JPEasier JPEasier added Needs: Author Feedback 👂 Awaiting feedback from the issue/PR author and removed Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still labels Nov 14, 2024
@jtracey93
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @anderseide ,

Firstly, thanks for your work on this PR!

We have made some changes to the AVM CI, detailed below, which means we need you to update your fork to pull in these latest changes and re-run your tests to show they still are passing prior to approving and merging this PR, as we don't and it fails once merged the publishing of your module will fail and will be blocked going forward until the test pass again via additional PRs.

Changes to CI That Have Been Made That You Need To Take Action On

Any questions reach out to the AVM Core Team by tagging us in your PR here or internally via Teams

Thanks

Jack (AVM Core Team)

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Needs: Attention 👋 Reply has been added to issue, maintainer to review and removed Needs: Author Feedback 👂 Awaiting feedback from the issue/PR author labels Nov 15, 2024
anderseide and others added 3 commits November 18, 2024 09:56
## Description

<!--
>Thank you for your contribution !
> Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
> Please also include the context.
> List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes Azure#3727 

-->

## Pipeline Reference

<!-- Insert your Pipeline Status Badge below -->

| Pipeline |
| -------- |
|
[![avm.res.cdn.profile](https://github.com/anderseide/avm-bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.cdn.profile.yml/badge.svg?branch=types-avm-res-cdn-profile)](https://github.com/anderseide/avm-bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.cdn.profile.yml)
|

## Type of Change

<!-- Use the checkboxes [x] on the options that are relevant. -->

- [ ] Update to CI Environment or utilities (Non-module affecting
changes)
- [X] Azure Verified Module updates:
- [ ] Bugfix containing backwards-compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT
bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in `version.json`:
- [ ] Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes
#{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
- [ ] The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an
issue to report it yet.
- [X] Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have
bumped the MINOR version in `version.json`.
- [ ] Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in
`version.json`.
  - [X] Update to documentation

## Checklist

- [X] I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same
update/change
- [X] I have run `Set-AVMModule` locally to generate the supporting
module files.
- [X] My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without
any errors or warnings

<!-- Please keep up to date with the contribution guide at
https://aka.ms/avm/contribute/bicep -->
## Description

Add WAF Security PS Rule Config as agreed, defined below:

1. New PSRule custom baseline with explicit rules added based on WAF
security work, prioritizing top 20 resources
2. Run of PSRule with `Azure.Pillar.Security` in "audit only" mode
(`continue_on_error = true`)

## Pipeline Reference

<!-- Insert your Pipeline Status Badge below -->

| Pipeline |
| -------- |
|
[![avm.res.container-registry.registry](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.container-registry.registry.yml/badge.svg?branch=feat%2Fadd-waf-security)](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.container-registry.registry.yml)
- Note failure is not due to changes and is in different job |
|
[![avm.res.network.firewall-policy](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.firewall-policy.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.firewall-policy.yml)
- failing as rule is not passing as expected |
|
[![avm.res.network.azure-firewall](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.azure-firewall.yml/badge.svg?branch=feat%2Fadd-waf-security)](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.azure-firewall.yml)
|

|[![avm.res.network.application-gateway-web-application-firewall-policy](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.application-gateway-web-application-firewall-policy.yml/badge.svg?branch=feat%2Fadd-waf-security)](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.application-gateway-web-application-firewall-policy.yml)
|
|
[![avm.res.network.application-gateway](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.application-gateway.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.network.application-gateway.yml)
- failing as expected |
|
[![avm.res.storage.storage-account](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.storage.storage-account.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/Azure/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.storage.storage-account.yml)
- Note failure is not due to changes and is in different job|

## Type of Change

<!-- Use the checkboxes [x] on the options that are relevant. -->

- [x] Update to CI Environment or utilities (Non-module affecting
changes)
- [ ] Azure Verified Module updates:
- [ ] Bugfix containing backwards-compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT
bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in `version.json`:
- [ ] Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes
#{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
- [ ] The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an
issue to report it yet.
- [ ] Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have
bumped the MINOR version in `version.json`.
- [ ] Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in
`version.json`.
  - [ ] Update to documentation

## Checklist

- [x] I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same
update/change
- [x] I have run `Set-AVMModule` locally to generate the supporting
module files.
- [x] My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without
any errors or warnings

<!-- Please keep up to date with the contribution guide at
https://aka.ms/avm/contribute/bicep -->
## Description

Add User Defined Types to the Log Analytics Workspace module.
Also fixes Azure#3798 

## Pipeline Reference

<!-- Insert your Pipeline Status Badge below -->

| Pipeline |
| -------- |
|
[![avm.res.operational-insights.workspace](https://github.com/krbar/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.operational-insights.workspace.yml/badge.svg?branch=users%2Fkrbar%2FlawUDT)](https://github.com/krbar/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.operational-insights.workspace.yml)
|

## Type of Change

<!-- Use the checkboxes [x] on the options that are relevant. -->

- [ ] Update to CI Environment or utilities (Non-module affecting
changes)
- [x] Azure Verified Module updates:
- [ ] Bugfix containing backwards-compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT
bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in `version.json`:
- [ ] Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes
#{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
- [ ] The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an
issue to report it yet.
- [ ] Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have
bumped the MINOR version in `version.json`.
- [x] Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in
`version.json`.
  - [ ] Update to documentation

## Checklist

- [x] I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same
update/change
- [x] I have run `Set-AVMModule` locally to generate the supporting
module files.
- [x] My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without
any errors or warnings

<!-- Please keep up to date with the contribution guide at
https://aka.ms/avm/contribute/bicep -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Alexander Sehr <ASehr@hotmail.de>
@anderseide anderseide requested review from a team as code owners November 18, 2024 15:56
@anderseide
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @anderseide ,

Firstly, thanks for your work on this PR!

We have made some changes to the AVM CI, detailed below, which means we need you to update your fork to pull in these latest changes and re-run your tests to show they still are passing prior to approving and merging this PR, as we don't and it fails once merged the publishing of your module will fail and will be blocked going forward until the test pass again via additional PRs.

Changes to CI That Have Been Made That You Need To Take Action On

Any questions reach out to the AVM Core Team by tagging us in your PR here or internally via Teams

Thanks

Jack (AVM Core Team)

After a bit back and forth build pipeline is now green: avm.res.container-instance.container-group

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs: Attention 👋 Reply has been added to issue, maintainer to review Needs: Module Owner 📣 This module needs an owner to develop or maintain it Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[AVM Module Issue]: Unable to create a container instance with 0.5 GiB memory
5 participants