Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove await from support bundle autofac construction #3453

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2020

Conversation

lfitchett
Copy link
Contributor

Autofac inconsistently breaks if you await before resolving something.

Copy link
Contributor

@dylanbronson dylanbronson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 7c1706a into Azure:master Aug 25, 2020
dylanbronson pushed a commit to dylanbronson/iotedge that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2020
Autofac inconsistently breaks if you await before resolving something.
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2020
Autofac inconsistently breaks if you await before resolving something.

Cherry-pick: 7c1706a
davilu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2020
* Remove await from support bundle autofac construction (#3453)

Autofac inconsistently breaks if you await before resolving something.

* adding bool.trueString to cleanup processor metrics label to fix it

Co-authored-by: Lee Fitchett <lefitche@microsoft.com>
yophilav pushed a commit to yophilav/iotedge that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2020
* Remove await from support bundle autofac construction (Azure#3453)

Autofac inconsistently breaks if you await before resolving something.

* adding bool.trueString to cleanup processor metrics label to fix it

Co-authored-by: Lee Fitchett <lefitche@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants