Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AutoPR azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.PolicyInsights to add version stable/2021-10-01 #11024

Conversation

openapi-sdkautomation[bot]
Copy link

Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#16250

curl -L "https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/16250/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights/azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights-1.0.0-beta.2.jar" -o azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAuto/16250/azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights branch 7 times, most recently from 950a4f1 to a9bed71 Compare September 30, 2021 23:19
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAuto/16250/azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights branch 4 times, most recently from 1a43401 to bb5d0e2 Compare October 13, 2021 00:47
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAuto/16250/azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights branch from bb5d0e2 to 3530e85 Compare October 22, 2021 16:23
Merge 3ff6f1cdf049090dc56ffd3001c22de0bdd218b7 into a87e536b2060dfe47c4d2bbf24a7f32d67944f9c
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAuto/16250/azure-resourcemanager-policyinsights branch from 3530e85 to ae98b2d Compare October 26, 2021 03:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants