Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update More Lenses integration to 4.2 #405

Closed

Conversation

scrubdaddytm
Copy link

Boils down to a merge of More Lenses 4.2.

Fixes issues mentioned in #404

lenses

@Sorxus
Copy link

Sorxus commented Jul 9, 2019

Hi!
For one lens there is written "$LensName$" and isn't active. On the other hand there is missing lens for Barbarians and Worker... :(

@Sorxus
Copy link

Sorxus commented Jul 20, 2019

Correction:
There is something weird, once there are lenses:

  • Religion, Continent, Appeal, Settler, Government, Political, Tourism, Empire, Loyalty, Power, Barbarian, Wonders, Naturalist, Builder, Scout, $LensName$, City Overlap, Resources,

and under some conditions (I couldn't say when) there are only these Lenses:

  • Religion, Continent, Appeal, Settler, Government, Political, Tourism, Empire, Loyalty, Power, $LensName$, City Overlap, Resources.

So in second case there are missing Barbarian, Wonders, Naturalist, Builder and Scout. It seems like a some strange bug...

@wayneb64
Copy link

The worst lense issue is the worker lense going away, any hope of a fix for that?

Anyone try the September patch yet with this version?

I hope CQUI isn't dead, Firaxis is putting out lots of good patches but giving up CQUI to get them is something I really don't want to do.

@Sorxus
Copy link

Sorxus commented Sep 25, 2019

Play with September patch, fix issues with Espionage Screen and Trade Screen with Astog's September remedy:
https://github.com/astog/BES/releases
https://github.com/astog/BTS/releases
Unpack them in corresponding place in Integration folder:
... \Sid Meier's Civilization 6\DLC\CQUI_Community-Edition-update-more-lenses\Integrations\

@Sorxus
Copy link

Sorxus commented Oct 6, 2019

I see carlos-witek made fix after my "instructions". Good! ;)

@carlos-witek
Copy link

carlos-witek commented Apr 26, 2020

@the-m4a so this PR has already been merged to expansion2 branch as part of your #415, correct? Perhaps we could close it then? Is it only @scrubdaddytm that can do it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants